My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-22-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
11-22-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2021 4:02:59 PM
Creation date
11/24/2021 3:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/22/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />4 <br />- Two commercial lot subdivision (tonight only one lot for development of an eye care clinic); 114 <br />- Aerial map of location; 115 <br />- Zoning allows for businesses; 116 <br />- Proposed Functional Classification System (transportation corridor); 117 <br />- Explanation of extension of Rosemary Road (Hugo); 118 <br />- Site Plan (Lot 1 only), including trail, sidewalk, performance standards; 119 <br />- Renderings of proposed structure; 120 <br />- Stormwater management; 121 <br />- Municipal sewer and water; 122 <br />- Wetlands (five on site); plan approved by Rice Creek Watershed District; 123 <br />- Planning and Zoning Board approved. 124 <br />- Findings of Fact (as included in resolution). 125 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked for clarification on the park dedication funds. Ms. Larsen noted that 126 <br />commercial is based on acreage and residential is per lot. 127 <br />Councilmember Lyden noted the development of an eye clinic; he’d like more information on 128 <br />parking. Ms. Larsen reviewed requirements; the developer’s proposed parking exceeds requirements. 129 <br />Councilmember Stoesz observed that there are many roads that cross city lines and sometimes the 130 <br />names are changed. He doesn’t like the name Rosemary Road and wouldn’t be unhappy if it were 131 <br />changed. Ms. Larsen noted that the developer is generally allowed to pick the street name; the City 132 <br />doesn’t have a street naming policy. 133 <br />Ross Hedlund, developer of clinic. They do mostly medical development. They work with tenants 134 <br />on parking and other needs to hit that right. This would be a four doctor practice maxing out at 20 135 <br />staff. 136 <br />Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 21-115 as presented. Councilmember 137 <br />Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 138 <br />6D) Consider Resolution No. 21-135 Approving Development Agreement Early Site Work / 139 <br />Grading Only for Belland Farms – City Engineer Hankee explained that the applicant for the 140 <br />previous plat would like to begin their site grading. The resolution authorizes an agreement. 141 <br />Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 21-135 as presented. Councilmember 142 <br />Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 143 <br />6E) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 21-132, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a 144 <br />Construction Contract, 2021 Surface Water Maintenance Project – City Engineer Hankee 145 <br />explained that the City received quotes for this year’s project. The locations are noted in the written 146 <br />report. The projects are generated in coordination by staff. She noted the low bidder and staff’s 147 <br />investigation of their product; staff is recommending approval. 148 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if the amount of work this year is consistent with previous years. Ms. 149 <br />Hankee said yes. 150
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.