My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-13-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
12-13-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2024 3:10:26 PM
Creation date
12/14/2021 12:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/13/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />end of things, he’s not getting the connection. Mr. Morgan said he could see more 43 <br />connection as they work toward logos and colors. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there has been any investigation of the name and possible 46 <br />other meanings. Mr. Morgan said they have done a cursory search. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Councilmember Ruhland remarked that in his real estate background, he hasn’t typically 49 <br />heard any reference to the rookery in connection with this area. 50 <br /> 51 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted his concern that people may not make the connection with 52 <br />the name easily. Mr. Morgan suggested that they are going for the super unique and that 53 <br />means that people have to become familiar with it but it is special enough to merit that; 54 <br />also he suggested that curiosity about the name could be a good thing. 55 <br /> 56 <br />Mr. Morgan and Mr. DelWiche added that the focus has really been toward the facility 57 <br />serving this community and they feel the community generally has familiarity with the 58 <br />herons. If the goal is to attract outside the community, then it’s a different approach. 59 <br /> 60 <br />Director DeGardner remarked that he believes that a unique name should be a goal. It’s 61 <br />going to be more defined through website, colors and logos. The group bringing this 62 <br />together feels The Rookery brings the best options for the future. 63 <br /> 64 <br />Councilmember Ruhland said he likes the name more as he thinks about it. He can see 65 <br />how it can be a unique theme; it ties into the City’s logo as well. 66 <br /> 67 <br />Councilmember Cavegn added that he sees the benefit of bringing in people from other 68 <br />nearby communities. 69 <br /> 70 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if the name is copyrighted at all or should it be on the 71 <br />City’s behalf. Marketing staff said they would check further based on direction to 72 <br />continue with it. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Mayor Rafferty remarked that he isn’t disappointed with the work presented but he is 75 <br />wondering if it wouldn’t be appropriate to hear other options at this point. He also asked 76 <br />if there are next step marketing concepts to discuss. 77 <br /> 78 <br />Director DeGardner remarked that staff has worked hard toward the possibility of 79 <br />opening the center April 1, 2022, if directed by the council. There is timing involved in 80 <br />that goal and based on the strong recommendation of the group bringing this forward, 81 <br />they didn’t feel options were warranted. The mayor thanked staff for that explanation. 82 <br /> 83 <br />There was general council concurrence to move forward. The council will be receiving 84 <br />more options on logos, color palates, etc. 85 <br /> 86
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.