03/15/1967 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

2— Also, the relay tower operates on a narrow beam line of eight principle. Ken Bryant, who also questioned the possibility of interference was further assured that none would result; rather this tower would help minimize interrupted TV pictures due to network failure because it would provide another path in the event of the failure of an existing link. Klepel questioned whether the village would have to grant permission before such changes as additional height to antenna and the like could be performed. The attorneys answered "Yes ". Glenn asked why the name of the tower was to be "Centerville Tower" rather than Lino Tower. The AT &T representatives replied that the FCC assigned the names and they had no control over this. It was moved by !r. Heckenlaible and seconded by Mr. Bryant to recommend that the council grant a special use permit to the AT &T for construction of this tower. In discussion Ralph L'Allier and other in the audience thought the tower should be named "Lino Tower." Motion carried. Attorney Locher further requested the AT&T appear before the council at their next meeting, presenting an exact legal description of the land. They also should apply for building permit. In other business discussion was held on street planning and village zoning. It was decided to hold a special meeting Thurs. Mar. 30 for working on planning maps. Building Inspector Al Dupre reported that a trailer house permit on Hiway 8 was past the 90 day limit and that no construction had as yet started on a home. After discussion the Bldg. Insp. was advided to keep in contact with the situation tad use his best judgment and follow legal action ifnecessary. Ken Bryant questioned ifa person should be appointed to represent us at Planning District II but was informed District II had performed its work and that astudy for which we paid should be forthcoming. A discussion was held on being able to have our own postal identity to help promote the village.