05/17/1972 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

May 17, 1972 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 8:05 P.M., May 17, 1972. All members were present with the exception of Mr. Winiecki, who was out of town. Mr. Kelling made note of the fact that the April 19th minutes, Page 2, paragraph 4, quote him as saying we do not have rights in regard to Center- ville Lake, since the Water Dept. has the priority. He said, for the record, we do have some rights. Mr. Kelling moved to accept the minutes of the April 19, 1972, meeting as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Scherer. Carried unanimously. Mr. Scherer moved to change page 2, sentence 7, of the "Plumbing and Sewer Regulations Adopted on April 24, 1972 ", to read: Percolation test required to be submitted to the Village Engineer. (Omit sentence two of the paragraph in its entirity). Seconded by Mr. Karth. Carried unanimously. Clyde Rehbein asked how this sentence got into this regulation. Mr. Marier said this was an information type paper. The viltage plumber wrote it out, they passed on it, and it was overlooked. It is a human error. Mrs. Kohler asked if any certified engineer could take the required perco- lation test. She said she had waited two weeks because she couldn't get hold of the viltage engineer. Mr. McLean told her any certified engineer would be qualified. Our engineer would qualify any test. Jim Husnik and Clyde Rehbein noted that some land won't pass the percolation test under any circumstances, and yet a drainfield will work. There was general discussion along this line. Mr. McLean noted that the purpose of this meeting is not to discuss the state code and perhaps that could be done at the May 24th meeting. They 011 be discussing the minimum square footage at this meeting and the engineer would be present. This might be a good time to have a question and answer period concerning the state code. The Clerk was advised to send notices to all members concerning this meeting. Jim Bratland was present to discuss sign #20 access. This has been carried over many months. He said the shop supervisor in charge of this sign was no longer with them. There is no access to this sign for inspection and maintenance. A helicopter was suggested, which Mr. Bratland said they would make available to our inspector. It was suggested that he try and work out a land easement with the property owner. Mr. Bratland said he would work at this and have an aswer one way or another in a month. Mr. McLean advised that the frontage road on the east side of 35E, between Main Street and County Rd. "J ", is posted for 9 tons. The rest of this road is posted for 5 ton. The part posted 9 ton is obviously not constructed for that much since each spring (and he has obser ved it for two years now) it becomes a real problem. It takes all summer to repair it. Mr. McLean recommended that the Council have correspondence with the County concerning this stretch and find out the reason for the differing ton limits. If it is a higher tonnage for the business along there, then perhaps they should be assessed or something.