My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/18/1972 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1972
>
10/18/1972 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2022 4:11:42 PM
Creation date
6/1/2022 4:10:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/18/1972
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Two <br />Parking was mentioned as a problem at this proposed park. gib'. Musch didn't feel <br />it would be a problem. It would be a park for mothers to take their children <br />ibr a walk end to maybe swim. He felt it would be premature to have a park on the <br />lest side of the Lake as it doen't fit in with anything. <br />W. McLean indicated the feeling of the Village was that the rest of the Village <br />must be considered too. He suggested running the park inland from the lake so as <br />to include more than lake activities. <br />The area in candy stripe on the Projeoted map is only land the company owns by <br />fee and contract ownership. <br />Mh'. Karth asked what the objection would be to give the extra land in the buffer <br />zone to the land owners. Yr. Busch felt it would be self defeating in terms of <br />open space area and space. Also some would be so large and the taxes very great. <br />Mt. Hill brought up the problem of mini bikes and snowmobiles on the buffer zone, <br />also the construction of fences around. property. <br />Mr. Busch felt the material used for the walkway wouldn't be suitable for mini <br />bikes. People aren't going to come from all over the country to bicycle. He <br />projected that if it worked it woad be continued throughout other areas. <br />MoLean asked if other uses were considered for this buffer zone when making <br />plans. Mr. Busch said more lots could have been put in. He also said it is not <br />the same exact layout 88 was planned with townhouses. <br />There was discussion as to public access tothe lake. The club house and marina <br />Mould be private. The feeling of the members was that there should be one public <br />access with boat launch, although usage of the Lire should be restricted es it is <br />cr..ly about 350 acres. W. Musoh didn't think a power boat access was necessary. <br />La lake is ideally set up for sail boating and small power boats. Mr. Hill asked <br />what is the primary use of the lake, fishing, recreation, etc? W. Busch said <br />the company's idea is that the lake be reasonably versatile to the people in the <br />area. He said the club house will be built first and then the marina. The <br />marina will be confined to small power crafts and sail boats. <br />It was questioned how the Village would control the lake. Mr. Busch felt it was <br />oremature for the Village to lay down any controls until they see what's <br />bappenning. <br />There was discussion as to the fishing in the lake. Mr. Kelling sold there <br />were crappies in the lake years ago, and if it were sufficiently deepened there <br />could be again. Jack IIielentheis said they have achieved a depth of 15-20 feet <br />ix1 some areas. <br />here was discussion concerning the walkways and the motorized vehicle problem <br />also maintenance of such a zone. It was noted that there is no way to keep <br />people off a public area. The problem of people throwing rubbish over the fence <br />such a zone was discussed. <br />There was discussion about changing the zoning from R5 to all Ri. Mr. Hill <br />elt if they don't, it's possible to later change to a different system. Mr <br />rich said the company has no objection to rezoning it all Rl. <br />lLn. Beyer presented a proposed tissue overlay of the vehicular curve mentioned <br />77.ty Mr. VanHousen at the last meeting. He had felt the side distance was limited.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.