My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/10/1990 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1990
>
10/10/1990 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2022 10:18:36 AM
Creation date
6/16/2022 10:18:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/1990
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Design Review Board <br />October 10, 1990 <br />1. Provision of wetland easements for the unbuildable <br />portions of the properties. <br />2. Combination of the 3.56 acre parcel with the existing <br />Alexejew parcel. <br />Mr. King seconded the motion and the motion was approved <br />unanimously. <br />REVIEW OF CITY CODE SECTION 1001.08, SUBDIVISION CODE, LOT <br />PROVISIONS /CITY ENGINEER, DAN BOXRUD. <br />Last month this item was discussed and the board members requested <br />that an ordinance be drawn up for review. <br />Dan Boxrud submitted a proposed ordinance to the board members <br />that would implement the lot dimension definitions. <br />The amendments would do two things: <br />1. Watercourses would be included in lots and not placed <br />in outlots. <br />2. Where lots have water they must still be within 10 feet <br />of required lot dimensions. <br />Dan Boxrud pointed out that if the watercourses were included in <br />the lots the city would not be liable for maintaining them as they <br />do outlots. <br />Mr. Chase asked about a sentence within subd. 1001.08. The <br />sentence states: Watercourses shall be protected by easements to <br />the anticipated high water level (as determined by the city). Mr. <br />Chase asked if a definition for normal and high water levels should <br />be incorporated into the definition section of the zoning <br />ordinance. He also suggested (as determined by the city) be left <br />out of the ordinance. <br />Dan Boxrud stated that the only reason he would prefer to leave in <br />(as determined by the city) is that several agencies may have <br />different criteria for the high water mark. If water levels are <br />established by the city we would have better control over that <br />area. <br />After further discussion a motion was made. <br />MOTION: Robert King moved to table this item because the board <br />wishes to have a clearer definition regarding what is the normal <br />water level and what is high water level. Monika Slatten seconded <br />4 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.