Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 11, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Janell Slater, 7869 Meadowview Trail, commented that one of the reasons to live in Lino <br />Lakes is the preference of large lots and sense of community that it gives. She is <br />concerned about the future of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Louise Fortuna, 523 Lois Lane, said that she has lived there for approximately 30 years. <br />She agreed that the original placement of the homes on the lots and the improvement of <br />Arlo Lane was intended for future subdivision. She also moved there for a larger size lot, <br />but appreciates the flexibility to subdivide if she chooses and is in support of the <br />proposed subdivision. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:06 p.m. Motion was <br />supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 4 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) <br /> <br />Staff addressed the public comment: <br /> <br />Staff noted that Mr. Isabell has the choice to cap the well or disconnect from the existing <br />system for irrigation purposes. <br /> <br />Chair Tralle stated that increased traffic is always a concern of existing property owners <br />when development occurs. <br /> <br />Staff noted that similar subdivision of properties occurred in both the Hailey Manor and <br />Golden Acre developments. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of a rezoning of property from R, <br />Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential, Preliminary Plat, and Variances to allow for lot <br />size and setback variations for a four-lot residential subdivision located at 535 Lois Lane, <br />to be called Isabell Estates, based on the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated June 5, 2014 shall be addressed. <br />2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated June 5, 2014 shall be <br />addressed. <br />3. The developer shall be responsible for grading the site, prepping the building pads <br />and constructing the storm water maintenance facilities. <br />4. The following executed documents are required to be approved by the City Council <br />prior to issuance of a Grading Permit: <br />a. Development Contract. <br />5. The following items shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a Grading <br />Permit: <br />a. Revised plans based on staff comments. <br />b. Executed Declaration for Maintenance of Storm Water Facilities. <br />c. NPDES Permit (if required). <br />d. RCWD Permit (if required). <br />e. Securities and Escrows as detailed in the Development Contract. <br />f. Grading Permit Fee of $150.