Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> <br />Land use. Development of single family development on land guided for more intense use such <br />as multi-family, commercial or industrial is not desirable and will create future conflicts. The <br />proposed FUD rural cluster would need to be limited to properties guided for low density <br />residential. <br /> <br />Transportation. The City’s transportation plan establishes access spacing guidelines based on <br />street functional classification. Direct driveway access to collector and arterial streets is not <br />desirable. Locating new public streets to serve small four lot cluster is not cost effective and <br />often may not meet the desired location for future access to surrounding properties. <br /> <br />Parcels Affected. Staff has created a map showing the FUD parcels that are guided low density <br />residential on the 2040 future land use plan with more than 20 acres to illustrate the number of <br />parcels affected by this discussion. There are 16 parcels shown on the map where the urban <br />cluster would apply. Several of these properties are immediately adjacent to municipal utilities <br />and are currently being considered for development. <br /> <br />Given the goal of retaining large lots in the MUSA and the limited number of landowners that <br />would benefit from the cluster subdivision, staff is not recommending the change. <br /> <br />The existing and drafted ordinance will still allow for existing habitable single family homes on <br />20 or more acres and built before 1992 to create a new lot with a minimum size of one acre for <br />the existing home. <br /> <br />Building Design Requirements <br /> <br />Staff has prepared updates to the Multi-family and Commercial, Industrial and Institutional <br />Building and Design standards to provide more guidance and promote higher quality design and <br />material use in new construction. <br /> <br />Multi-Family. The following principle changes are proposed: <br /> <br />1. All sides of building will be required to have 33% brick or stone instead of the <br />“combined area”. Additionally, stucco was removed as an alternative for brick or stone. <br />2. A provision was added to require building articulation and prohibit blank walls. <br />3. A provision was added to require vertical design elements to distinguish lower and upper <br />floors on multi-level buildings. <br /> <br />Commercial, Industrial and Institutional. The following changes are proposed: <br /> <br />1. Breaks existing allowed material types into classes of primary material for use with <br />building design. Adds wood as an approved material. <br /> <br />2. Changes minimum requirements for percentage of each material by class for commercial, <br />industrial and institutional uses. <br /> <br />3. A provision was added to require horizontal design elements for buildings with a length