My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-22-2022 City Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-22-2022 City Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 7:40:07 PM
Creation date
8/19/2022 4:22:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/22/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE : August 1, 2022 <br />5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED : 10:15 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, <br />8 Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT <br />10 <br />11 Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Community Development <br />12 Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Rookery Activity Center Manager <br />13 Lisa Lamey; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; Public Services Director Rick <br />14 DeGardner; Public Safety Deputy Director of Fire Division Dan L'Allier; City Clerk Julie <br />15 Bartell <br />16 <br />17 1. Hugo Public Works Facility Tour — 8220 140t" Street North Hugo, MN <br />18 <br />19 Community Room <br />20 Following Public Works Facility Tour <br />21 <br />22 2. Robinson Sod Farm Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) — <br />23 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed a PowerPoint presentation that <br />24 included information on the following: <br />25 <br />26 - Relevant terms that are included in these reviews; <br />27 - EAW questions are standards set by the state; does not approve or deny a project; <br />28 - EAW Process — City is proper unit to complete the document; process includes <br />29 distribution and comment period; City can respond to comments; City makes <br />30 determination based on need for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); environmental <br />31 review is done if no EIS is needed; <br />32 - Topics covered by an EAW; <br />33 - Project Background — yield or PUD (concept plan by developer calls for PUD); <br />34 (developer spoke to their desire to build something unique — yield plan is more common); <br />35 - Project Impact Analysis — includes surface water, public utilities, traffic; <br />36 - EAW Document — is available in full. <br />37 <br />38 Staff will be asking for council action to put the EAW out for comment (30 day comment <br />39 period) <br />40 <br />41 3. Water Treatment Plant — Design Services Proposal — Community <br />42 Development Director Grochala noted that WSB & Associates, Inc. has come forward <br />43 with a proposal for design services and staff is comfortable with the fees proposed. He <br />44 explained the elements that would be included — for water mains, treatment facility. <br />45 There would be an architectural partner on the project. Funding sources and possible <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.