My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-24-2022 City Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
10-24-2022 City Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 9:10:12 AM
Creation date
12/12/2022 2:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/24/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1st Reading:Publication: <br />2nd Reading: Effective: <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ORDINANCE NO. 04-22 <br />MARKETPLACE PDO AMENDMENT #3 FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLANS <br />FOR 601 APOLLO DRIVE RETAIL <br />The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: <br />Section 1: Finding of Fact <br />1. The City received a Land Use Application to amend the Marketplace Planned <br />Development (PDO) Design Guidelines Ordinance No. 03-05. <br />2. Ordinance No. 03-05 regulates site plan and design guidelines for the Marketplace <br />development and states under Special Provisions #4 that substantial departures from the <br />approved plans will require an amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). <br /> <br />3. Per the Marketplace PDO Site Plan, the subject site is a future bank. <br />4. The applicant is proposing to construct a dental clinic, coffee shop, and ATM <br />drive-thru thatwill require modifications to the site plan and building elevations. <br /> <br />5. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on September 14, 2022 and <br />recommended approval the PDO Amendment #3 and the site and building plans. <br />6. Per City Zoning Ordinance Section 1007.015(5), the Planning and Zoning Board <br />shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed ordinance amendment. Its <br />judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the followingfactors: <br />(a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies <br />and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />The proposed retail development is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />(b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of <br />the area. <br />The proposed retail development is compatible with present and future land uses. <br /> <br />(c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. <br />The proposed retail development conforms with all performance standards with revisions
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.