Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />3 <br />Randy Rennaker, 379 Carl Street, recommended that the council actually review the Environmental 79 <br />Board meeting recording. He suggests that it was a difficult decision for that group. He is 80 <br />concerned as a resident: that there are chemicals that have been used on the land for years and for the 81 <br />Carl Street connection (please keep the neighborhood the way it is). 82 <br />Carol Featherstone, 631 Andall Street, mentioned that the council wants good communities in the 83 <br />City. The people who moved to the Carl Street area moved there for its rural nature. She feels the 84 <br />council supports the developers more than the residents. She thinks an environmental review is 85 <br />necessary. Listen to the people please. 86 <br />Councilmember Lyden said he knows there is great concern about Carl Street. In his mind, there 87 <br />isn’t a right to destroy one neighborhood to develop another. 88 <br />Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 22-125 as presented. Councilmember 89 <br />Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 90 <br />6B) Public Hearing, Consider Resolution No. 22-126, Approving Tax Increment Financing 91 <br />Plan for District 1-14– Community Development Director Grochala reviewed his written staff report 92 <br />that included information on a proposed tax increment district for a development proposed by Ryan 93 <br />and Companies (area indicated on a map and in staff report). He reviewed elements of the proposal 94 <br />and benefits that it would bring. The City has evaluated the request of the developer for tax 95 <br />increment assistance with the help of financial advisor Baker Tilly. A recommendation comes 96 <br />forward for total assistance of $3.4 million. It was noted that the both the county and the school 97 <br />district will have the opportunity to comment. 98 <br />Scott Featherstone, 631Andall Street, asked about the City’s liability if the project isn’t finished. He 99 <br />also noted that he sees few benefits that the facility would bring, including the number of jobs for the 100 <br />community. Mayor Rafferty asked staff for an estimation of job creation and staff responded that is 101 <br />not known at this point but some data related to the size of the facility is upwards of 250 jobs; more 102 <br />data will become evident as the development moves on. 103 <br />Community Development Director Grochala noted the pay-as-you-go nature of the tax increment, 104 <br />meaning the City will not reimburse the developer unless they meet certain requirements. 105 <br />Councilmember Lyden remarked that he’s all about creating good areas; will there be some outside 106 <br />employee facilities included. 107 <br />Councilmember Lyden moved to approve Resolution No. 22-126 as presented. Councilmember 108 <br />Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 109 <br />6C) 601 Apollo Drive Retail: i.) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04-22, Marketplace 110 <br />PDO Amendment #3 to Ordinance No. 03-05; ii) Consider Resolution No. 22-115 Approving 111 <br />Marketplace PDO Amendment #3 for Site & Building Plans; iii) Consider Resolution No. 22-116 112 <br />Approving Site Improvement Performance Agreement - – City Planner Larsen reviewed a 113 <br />presentation that included information on: 114 <br />- Amendment process to change land use for the site to allow for dental clinic, coffee shop and 115 <br />ATM; 116 <br />- Part of Marketplace Master Plan (detail design details); 117 <br />- Site Plan – including details; 118 <br />- Architectural Details; 119 <br />- Planning and Zoning recommendation for approval (with two additions); 120