Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />2 <br />A) Consider Approval of Expenditures for October 10, 2022 40 <br /> (Check No. 117274 through 117365) in the Amount of 41 <br />$740,401.77 Approved 42 <br />B) Consider Approval of September 26, 2022 Council 43 <br />Work Session Minutes Approved 44 <br />C) Consider Approval of September 26, 2022 Council 45 <br />Minutes Approved 46 <br />D) Consider Approval of LG220 Exempt Gambling Permit for 47 <br />St. Joseph’s of the Lakes Annual Scholarship Raffle Approved 48 <br />FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 49 <br />There was no report from the Finance Department. 50 <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 51 <br />There was no report from the Administration Department. 52 <br />PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 53 <br />4A) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 03-22, Enacting Ordinance Chapter 619 54 <br />Regulating Edible Cannabinoid Products – Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed his written 55 <br />staff report recommending regulations in the City on edible cannabinoid products. A recent law 56 <br />change came as something of a surprise to most cities and some cities (including Lino Lakes) imposed 57 <br />a moratorium on licensing. Staff is now presenting an ordinance that would add a new chapter to the 58 <br />City Code on this subject. The ordinance is aligned with how the City regulates off-sale liquor. 59 <br />Councilmember Lyden thanked staff for their work in putting this together. 60 <br />Councilmember Lyden moved to approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 03-22 as presented. 61 <br />Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 62 <br />PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 63 <br />There was no report from the Public Services Department. 64 <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 65 <br />6A) Consider Resolution No. 22-125, Approving Record of Decision, Robinson Farms, 66 <br />EAW– Community Development Director Grochala explained the Environmental Assessment 67 <br />Worksheet process and the City’s role. The City has responded to questions received through the 68 <br />process; that information is included in the report. The Environmental Board reviewed this at their 69 <br />last meeting and some additional comments were received. The finding is that no additional 70 <br />findings are required. The Environmental Board has recommended approval of the record of 71 <br />decision. 72 <br />Alison Harwood of WSB & Associates reported further on the contents of the EAW. She reviewed a 73 <br />presentation that outlined the process and provided information on additional comments received. 74 <br /> 75 <br />Councilmember Lyden said he has read the report. He isn’t making a recommendation. He asked 76 <br />staff for a scaled down version of how this would rank for an EIS requirement. Staff responded that, 77 <br />based on the study, there is not a need to do an EIS. 78