Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />one is already in the car delivering the organics to a site, they could drive it to another area such 87 <br />as City Hall. If the City has roughly 7,600 homes with only 500 of those utilizing the program, 88 <br />perhaps there is a better site. Community Development Director Grochala explained that the City 89 <br />evaluated other locations at City Hall and that it would be front-facing and still need garbage 90 <br />access which would not work in the parking lot. Regarding the Rookery they did not want to 91 <br />impact any future expansion at that site. Mr. Grochala said the site at Marshan Park is closer to 92 <br />existing homes and playgrounds than they would be at Sunrise Park. The City believes fencing it 93 <br />off and screening is consistent with Code requirements to keep it secluded around the corner of 94 <br />the building with the playground across the parking lot (a couple hundred feet away). 95 <br /> 96 <br />Ms. Schmitt asked if they can include an organics enclosure in the planning of a new public 97 <br />works facility. Mr. Grochala anticipated that if/when they build a public works facility they 98 <br />would have an organics enclosure location there. 99 <br /> 100 <br />Councilmember Lyden is not for putting these in the parks. He suggested having one location for 101 <br />people to bring their organics to, such as the oil-dumping site from years past. 102 <br /> 103 <br />Councilmember Cavegn inquired as to what the growth, in terms of participation, in the program 104 <br />has been. Mr. Nelson noted that the City is not currently meeting the SCORE grant tonnage 105 <br />target for organics, so this is the greatest opportunity for improvement in the City. 106 <br /> 107 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there is opportunity for a public/private partnership with a 108 <br />business in the area who might host the organics enclosure. 109 <br /> 110 <br />Councilmember Ruhland agreed and suggested reaching out to some businesses within the City. 111 <br /> 112 <br />Lori Houle, 6957 Sunrise Drive, asked why they can’t have the organics enclosure at a 113 <br />composting site. Mr. Nelson explained it is a matter of what materials one can bring to those 114 <br />compost sites (yard waste), as some cannot process food materials such as dairy, bones, and 115 <br />meat. 116 <br /> 117 <br />Mr. Grochala clarified if City Council does not want this program, the City can scrap the 118 <br />program and reject the grant. He noted it sounds like Sunrise Park is ruled out. Staff can look at 119 <br />other options and if they do not have anything in the next couple of weeks they will return the 120 <br />grant. 121 <br /> 122 <br />Item 3 — No Mow May — Environmental Coordinator Nelson gave a summary of his written 123 <br />report and explained by not mowing one’s lawn in May it may provide benefit to pollinator 124 <br />species. If there is support from the City Council, they would direct staff not to enforce the grass 125 <br />and weed Ordinance for the month of May. 126 <br /> 127 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked whether there is an actual benefit to the pollinator species. 128 <br /> 129 <br />Mr. Nelson thinks the benefit is less than what was advertised from the group out of the United 130 <br />Kingdom; however, it would help shift the aesthetic public perception more in favor of natural 131