Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />landscape methods as there is an education component along with it. He shared that grants are 132 <br />available for native gardens and tree plantings. 133 <br /> 134 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted that many residents in Lino Lakes are fertilizing their lawns and 135 <br />likely choking out any pollinator species. 136 <br /> 137 <br />The Environmental Board recommended considering No Mow May back in 2022. 138 <br /> 139 <br />The consensus of the Council was to not move forward with No May May at this time. 140 <br /> 141 <br />Item 4 — Boulevard Tree Policy — Environmental Coordinator Nelson gave a summary of his 142 <br />written report and shared that currently every new residential house gets a boulevard tree as part 143 <br />of the developer agreement. The City maintains and prunes those trees, and if a tree dies the City 144 <br />will remove the tree and restore the area to turf grass. The City has been replacing those trees as 145 <br />they die from the forestry budget. He asked whether the City would like to continue requiring 146 <br />boulevard tree planting. 147 <br /> 148 <br />The Councilmembers were in favor of the requirement for boulevard trees at the developer’s 149 <br />expense. 150 <br /> 151 <br />Mr. Nelson asked if the City should continue the practice of replacing boulevard trees that have 152 <br />been removed at cost of about $500 per tree at an estimated 60 trees per year; he clarified it 153 <br />would probably be about 30 trees per year when Emerald Ash Borer is under control. 154 <br /> 155 <br />The Councilmembers discussed and were in favor of continuing the replacement program. 156 <br /> 157 <br />Mr. Nelson asked whether a resident should have the choice to opt-out of replacement of the 158 <br />boulevard tree associated with their property if it is removed. 159 <br /> 160 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted if the City requires it to begin with, it is part of the aesthetic of 161 <br />trees within the City. 162 <br /> 163 <br />The Councilmembers discussed an were not in favor of allowing residents to opt-out of a 164 <br />replacement tree. 165 <br /> 166 <br />Councilmember Lyden stated if someone wanted a more expensive tree they may be able to pay 167 <br />the difference. Mr. Grochala noted the City is very careful about tree selection in the boulevard 168 <br />so they do not run into situations like Emerald Ash Borer. They want to be sure the replacement 169 <br />is a good, hardy tree. 170 <br /> 171 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if someone puts a tree in that isn’t the City standard, does the City 172 <br />make the resident remove the tree? Mr. Nelson noted it is on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Grochala 173 <br />clarified the City does have the ability to remove the tree and charge the resident for it. 174 <br /> 175 <br />Item 5 — Park and Trail Improvement Fund Projects — Public Services Director DeGardner 176 <br />gave a summary of his written report based on Park Board discussion with an updated list of 177