My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-06-2023 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
Searchable Packets
>
03-06-2023 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2023 10:16:08 AM
Creation date
3/21/2023 10:02:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/06/2023
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />4. Does the Board support amending the Comprehensive Plan to lower the density to <br />achieve the proposed PUD Concept Plan? Yes, but only to Low Density Mixed Use <br />(3-4 units per net acre) <br /> <br />5. For consideration, the Board could support lowering the density but not the PUD. <br />This would require the applicant to design a development that meets all <br />conventional R-2 zoning standards. <br />a. e.g. 60ft wide lots, 125ft deep, 7,500 sf lot size (not including stormwater <br />ponds), architectural standards etc. <br /> <br />PUD rezoning was supported by Board. <br /> <br />6. Should the applicant hold a neighborhood meeting prior to submission of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat <br />submittal? Yes <br /> <br />PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat <br /> <br />The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive <br />Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop <br />the property as depicted by the concept plan. All other applicable comments from <br />previous staff reports still apply. <br /> <br />A land use application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD Preliminary <br />Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be submitted together. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Staff has concerns regarding the lack of density and the financial feasibility of an HOA <br />maintaining the private road, lawn care, nature area, snow removal, etc. Those costs will <br />be spread over fewer units resulting in higher per unit HOA fees vs. spreading them out <br />over more units. This parcel was intentionally guided for medium density to allow for <br />more units to account for these costs as well as the cost of realigning Vicky Lane with <br />Kelly Street. <br /> <br />A more compatible housing product for this site would be the R-2 two family or R-3 <br />townhome product. Examples of medium density residential development immediately <br />in the area are the two and three unit products in Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition on <br />Nancy Court or the four unit products in Highland Meadows West on Marilyn Drive and <br />Oak Lane. <br /> <br />Requested Council Direction <br /> <br />Does the City Council support? <br />1. Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development <br />2. Amending the Comprehensive Plan to lower the density
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.