Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES December 11, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br />7 <br />Development Director Grochala remarked that if the council decides to go ahead with the hearing on 240 <br />improvements, the survey really becomes a mute point. 241 <br />Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, impacted homeowner. Mr. Trehus noted first that work on culverts 242 <br />is proposed to begin at the end of 2018 and work on street in 2019 so there should be another year for 243 <br />planning? Ms. Hankee said there is permitting required (four to six months – first itteration) so no 244 <br />there is not much time. When Mr. Trehus asked additional questions about the schedule and how 245 <br />much additional time is there for planning to provide for a more open and transparent process. Ms. 246 <br />Hankee said as long as the council decides, adding that the condition of the road has to be 247 <br />consideration. Mr. Trehus recalled information he has submitted regarding the protection of wetlands 248 <br />in certain right of ways; he’d like to see more information submitted to the watershed district in order 249 <br />to answer questions about deliniation of wetland. 250 <br />Mayor Reinert asked if the report submitted is in its final form? Staff said yes. Mr. Grochala added a 251 <br />response regarding the status of wetland deliniation. What the council is being asked tonight is to 252 <br />concur with the design costs proposed for utility improvements. Ms. Hankee explained that the 253 <br />project schedule is much slower than is typical and that’s because of the public process involved. She 254 <br />is willing to meet with Mr. Trehus. 255 <br />The council and Mr. Trehus discussed the petition process, the schedule and charter requirements. Mr. 256 <br />Trehus noted that it’s unfair that there was a survey done for the LaMotte project but not for West 257 <br />Shadow Lake. Mayor Reinert directed staff to do a survey; the city wants to do everything possible to 258 <br />hear from the residents and see what the majority wants to do. He supports having a complete process. 259 <br />Mr. Trehus said he sees things in the report now that are just appearing, which he reviewed. Mayor 260 <br />Reinert explained that this is a point of receiving information and the council is just accepting that 261 <br />information tonight. 262 <br />Mayor Reinert ended discussion. Council Member Maher said she doesn’t like seeing a constituent 263 <br />leaving in anger. 264 <br />Council Member Manthey asked if a hearing process will include notes on who is attending; Mr. 265 <br />Grochala said it’s whomever comes to the microphone. 266 <br />Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 17-149 as presented. Council Member 267 <br />Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 268 <br />Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 17-150 as presented. Council Member 269 <br />Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 270 <br />Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 17-151 as presented. Council Member 271 <br />Kusterman seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 272 <br /> 273 <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS 274 <br /> 275 <br />There was no Unfinished Business. 276 <br /> 277 <br />NEW BUSINESS 278 <br /> 279 <br />There was no New Business. 280