Laserfiche WebLink
5. Capital improvement plan; and <br />6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. <br />The Preliminary Plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in <br />regards to land use, housing, economic development, transportation,, local water management <br />plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. <br />(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill <br />policies: <br />1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area <br />(MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; <br />2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the <br />following: <br />a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; <br />b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the <br />developer; <br />c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with <br />available city trunk funds; and <br />d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's <br />capital improvement plan. <br />3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the <br />normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and <br />4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future <br />operation and maintenance. <br />The Preliminary Plot is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current <br />Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. The cost,, operation and maintenance of the utility system is <br />consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future <br />utility costs are proposed. <br />(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the <br />following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity <br />Manual: <br />1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic <br />generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one <br />grade; <br />2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a <br />proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; <br />3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a <br />proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; <br />4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access <br />to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must <br />provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of <br />service D or better; <br />0 <br />