My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-26-2024 City Council Agenda Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-26-2024 City Council Agenda Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2024 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
8/23/2024 3:47:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/26/2024
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes -9- July 8, 2024 <br />1. CONSENT AGENDA <br />Motion to Approve Expenditures for July 8, 2024 (Check No. 120995 through 121039) in the <br />Amount of $573,685.60. <br />RESULT: <br />CARRIED [UNANIMOUS] <br />MOVER: <br />Lyden <br />SECONDER: <br />Ruhland <br />AYES: <br />Rafferty, Cavegn, Lynde, Ruhland and Stoesz <br />2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />No Report <br />3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />The City Clerk reported that the City was in receipt of three petitions. One related to an <br />ordinance amendment and two related to Charter Amendments. She stated that this evening <br />the petitions were being submitted for receipt as being technically sufficient. She reported that <br />the number of required signatures and form of the petition was determined to be technically <br />sufficient. She stated that the City Attorney would then be completing a review as to their legal <br />sufficiency. She reviewed the timelines for placing the matters on a future ballot, noting that <br />August 131" is the date for submitting language to the County for inclusion on the November <br />ballot. <br />Council Member Lynde confirmed that the ordinance amendment could be adopted by the City <br />Council directly, without a ballot measure. <br />The City Attorney provided a further overview of the process. He stated that first step in the <br />process after receiving either initiative petition, which is the ordinance that's proposed and <br />then presented to the Council, or a petition for a Charter Amendment is to determine the <br />technical sufficiency under either state law or the charter provisions that may apply to that. <br />The City Attorney stated the second step, and that's the one we'll be discussing in the future, <br />arises from the fact that there's a significant amount of case law in Minnesota that positions <br />city councils to be gatekeepers of petition processes in a Charter City. So as things pass from <br />the petition through the Charter Commission as to the amendments, and up to the Council, <br />assuming it's all technically sufficient, it's still necessary to assure that there aren't legal <br />infirmities in the proposals. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.