Laserfiche WebLink
Collector road right of way. The right-of-way width of Haywood drive (Street C) will be reduced <br />from 80' to 60' along Haywood Drive (Street Q. This is consistent with previous flexibility to <br />applied to the Natures Refuge to the south. The reduction in width minimizes the <br />development footprint and increases the area of preservation. Sidewalk will still be included <br />within the 60' right-of-way to accommodate pedestrians. <br />Cul de sac length. The cul de sac length of Street D is proposed at 620'. 500' is the maximum <br />length allowed. The street will be 32 feet wide instead of typical 30' and include hydrants and <br />midpoint and end of cul de sac. <br />Corner Lot width and Corner Setback. The applicant has requested a reduction in Corner Lot <br />width from the required 80' to 70' and Corner Lot setback from 25' to 20'. Corner lot widths <br />are generally wider to accommodate building setbacks from both streets and provide <br />uniformity between lots fronting different streets. The city has generally allowed for reduced <br />width and setback where corner lots back up to another corner lot or open space. Staff is <br />supportive of this request. <br />Side Setbacks. Side yard setbacks will be 7.5' instead of the typical 10' and 5. This maintains a <br />uniform side yard setback between homes. <br />Garage Requirements. The applicant originally requested flexibility from the garage area (520 <br />SF), width (20'), and garage architectural design standards. The Planning & Zoning Board <br />recommended that no flexibility be granted. The applicant has revised plans to meet or exceed <br />both the garage area and garage width requirements. However, they continue to request <br />flexibility to allow the garage to protrude 5' in front of the house without the front porch <br />requirement. They also request flexibility on the maximum length of the garage wall facing the <br />street from 50% of the front fagade width to a maximum of 57%. <br />The garage architectural requirements are intended to minimize the visual impact of garage <br />dominated streetscapes and avoid monotony on narrow lots of the R-2 zoning district. Of the <br />34 home different elevations proposed by M/I, only six include the protruding garage. Given <br />the number of architectural choices the concern over a repetitive layouts being used <br />throughout the development is minimized. However, there is no specific requirement that <br />would prevent this. <br />With the expansion of the maximum garage width percentage all of the houses to <br />accommodate the garage size adjustments. The villas are intended to provide single level living <br />so a majority of units do not provide the 2nd level living space required to exceed the 50% <br />maximum garage length. With the increase to 57% all products would comply and the <br />developer would agree to meet all the same requirements including: <br />11 <br />