08-04-25 - City Council Work Session Agenda

Home Search

Comment What it would do for me personally is completely destroy the value of my property, at least to me. Please let me know as soon as possible if this is a serious possibility so that I can start looking for another place to live. If that road is built neither of the scenarios will make any difference to me since I would not be living in Lino Lakes anymore. Response sense of how the infrastructure could be laid out to coincide with the changes in land use; however, future developers would propose specific road networks for City review and would need to align with the access points shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis (see Appendix D of the AUAR). Comment noted. The City underwent a multi - phased engagement process to determine the scenarios to evaluate in the AUAR. More I am not sure what more feedback on this issue will achieve, guessing it's probably information about the process can be found on just a mandatory part of the whole AUAR process and will not have any impact the project website here: whatsoever on what is eventually allowed to go forward. I would hope that by now https://mappingnwmain.com/process and the wishes of the residents living in close proximity to the proposed development engagement summaries of the feedback we area are fairly well known, i.e. "Slow the Grow". Simply put those wishes are; the collected can be found here: lowest possible housing density and the highest possible green natural space https://mappingnwmain.com/resources possible. At 3400 or 3500 units neither of the scenarios presented come close to achieving this, at least in my view. Dividing the 962 acres by 3450 units gives about The intent of this process was to gather only .28 acres per unit. But it is really even lower than this since at significant community feedback on the scenarios and portion of the 962 acres are already fully developed (not sure why they were even establish development criteria for future projects included in the study). I would be interested to know what the process and criteria in this area, without impacting citywide sewered were that determined what the appropriate density should be. If this was residential average densities of 3-5 units per acre explained in the AUAR report I must have missed it. There must have been some as required by the Metropolitan Council. Scenario consistent considerations since both scenarios come up with almost the same 1 is based on the City's existing 2040 overall density. Comprehensive Plan, aiming to maintain consistent housing units and densities across scenarios in line with City-wide density requirements. In order for the density proposed to be achieved it looks to me like it will be at a Any proposed floodplain alterations by future very high cost since according to the map presented in the AUAR about half of the developers will require the submittal of an acres are in the FEMA flood zones. An awful lot of dirt will have to be moved appropriate Letter of Map Change to FEMA and 15 Page 554 of 617