08-25-25 - City Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

5 • “I don’t mind density. I know it is a dirty word around here. The issue is there needs to be amenities. Parks, trail, eateries, jobs, transit, etc. Not just SFH” • “Minneapolis/St. Paul, crime, stress, congestion, Google – high population density stress” • “No high structures (> 3 -4 stories)” • “Lots of traffic, noise, lights. Less nature I don’t like the fact that we are being forced to build medium + high density. It seems like we have no say in the matter. Very frustrating Side note: It would be very helpful if the city would explain the Met Council, why we have to abide by their rules. Either put explanation on website or Quad Paper.” • “Low density” • “Structures close together. I like larger lots. 1 to 5 acres each.” Figure 3 Photo of project staff showing open house attendee Scenario 2 display board Comments Received via Website Comment Form • 4 comment forms were submitted through the website. Themes includes: o Desire to see an equal representation of high medium and low density distributed evenly between the two sod propertie s (north and south of Main Street) o Not in favor of connecting Carl Street and concerned if it was it would become a major throughfare with the proposed medium and high den sity in our area o Desire to not see low and cheap quality of homes built o Prefer Scenario 2: 6 ▪ See a benefit having small scale commercial and higher density on Main Street towards the western border of Lino Lakes and Blaine • It will be an easy flow between that area and the current developed land to the west in Blaine. ▪ The traffic for high density is consolidated along a major road and potentially will keep traffic from driving through other neighborhoods as there will be easy access to Main Street and Sunset (and over to Lexington Ave to access 35W.) ▪ The wetlands are mostly surrounded by low density housing, making them more visible if surrounded by larger structures. ▪ Each of the park areas are relatively close to high density area providing easy access to more residents. o Supportive of the regional trail connection on Main Street, and the two parks to be developed. o Concern about timing of development and current properties not ready to develop. o How does a mosque fit into these plans? o Keep “s” curves to a minimum, curved roads to slow traffic are good, but not “S” curves make it harder for the driver’s vision. o No desire for more large chain store, auto shop, fast food, bank or liquor store added. It’s a slippery slope to go down. o With traffic increasing, consideration for the safety of walkers and bikes via paved paths or sidewalks and public transportation. Comments Received on Interactive Map Scenario 1: • “In my opinion, this scenario makes the most sense as it seems to be blend in based on what is already existing. I think you could put higher density up against the Blaine boundary to better match what they have put in.” • “Most of the lots appear to be single family homes. In the past there was a law to stop development, which was highly correlated with the previous development plan to have a more ethnically diverse population. We should prioritize the intent of the previous development and consider low income housing and mixed use space, including religious institutions.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN AUGUST 25, 2025 INDEX | 53Page 107 of 171