My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-25-25 - City Council Agenda
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-25-25 - City Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 8:35:53 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 8:21:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/25/2025
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br />Scenario 2: <br />• “I like #2 because it puts the commercial area next to blaine and gives them the <br />chance to add more commercial to it. It would be nice to adopt a dark sky take on <br />commercial and residential lighting. main st was always to see the northern lights, <br />let’s keep it that way.” <br />• “Coordination with the City of Blaine is needed for this scenario to look good. <br />Doubtful Blaine will change their plan to fit this. I do like the idea of directing traffic <br />towards a focal point – wither a park or lake. This scenario kind of entails that.” <br />• “It feel like the commercial space is trying to escape Lino Lakes and seems difficult <br />to get developers to commit to this vision. Seems to be cut in half. I think it might <br />look good on paper but I can’t help but think this will look poorly planned, half <br />baked, and incomplete in real life” <br />• “This is a strong concept that maintains commercial visibility and accessibility from <br />Main Street while also creating a distinct “gateway” and preserving of commercial- <br />only zones at the intersection of Main and Sunset, instead of mixed -use <br />residential/commercial areas.” <br />• “The park is so far from the retail and even higher density areas. Being able to get a <br />bite/drink and go to the park is a natural pairing. Park also generates foot traffic for <br />business. The SFH has the least need for the park. Seems poorly located.” <br />Scenario 3: <br />• “Assuming wetland buffers are used along the road I really think this is the best <br />option. Keep the housing set back a little so there is a little more of a ‘small town’ <br />feel when driving through and more importantly, quitter more comfortable living <br />options for those who live here.” <br />Comments Received via Interactive Map Survey <br />Question: Which of the scenarios do you prefer? What opportunities do you see in your <br />preferred scenario? <br />• Scenario 1: Two respondents selected this scenario <br />• Scenario 2: Three respondents selected this scenario <br />• Scenario 3: One respondent selected this scenario <br />Question: What opportunities do you see in your preferred scenario? <br />• Scenario 1: <br />o “Businesses have higher visibility to Main Street. Put higher priced homes <br />further back where there is less visibility.” <br /> <br />8 <br />• Scenario 2: <br />o “More consolidated along main street. Not affecting as much existing <br />residential space.” <br />o “Opportunities I see are keeping higher density housing/commercial zoning <br />away from the existing residents/neighborhoods of Lino Lakes. The city <br />should advocate that the proposed density of housing match the existing <br />density that it will be developed next to.” <br />o This is a strong concept that maintains commercial visibility and <br />accessibility from Main street while also creating a distinct “gateway” and <br />preserving open spaces.” <br />• Scenario 3: <br />o “I feel like this has the opportunity to lessen traffic congestion, which is the <br />biggest concern. This will keep traffic spread out so that it is not right in one <br />dense area.” <br />Question: Is there anything you would change in your preferred scenario? <br />• Scenario 1: <br />o “Commercial or high density res. along Main street. Maybe we could get a <br />grocery store or a couple restaurants here? Another starbucks?” <br />o “Eliminate the high density housing, more green space” <br />• Scenario 2: <br />o “I would like to see direct feeder roads to main street. I see only connecting <br />roads to existing residential roads.” <br />o “Yes, the high density housing. As a property owner adjacent to the proposed <br />development, I moved there for the rural life style/low density area and would <br />hate to be pushed out due to the significant change.” <br />o “I would like us to explore the possibility of commercial -only zones instead of <br />mixed -use residential/commercial areas.” <br />• Scenario 3: <br />o “Honestly I think that possibly a combo Scenario 2 on the south side of Main <br />Street and Scenario 3 on the north side might work the best. This keeps <br />traffic in already built in neighborhoods on the south of Main Street to the <br />main roads, rather than some of the high density traffic cutting through those <br />neighborhoods. This also makes it so the high density areas are not all in one <br />spot and will still make the drive and area feel more open.” <br />ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) <br />OPEN HOUSE 2 <br />MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN <br />AUGUST 25, 2025 INDEX | 54Page 108 of 171
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.