Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />09/04/2025 <br />Page 5 <br />13.The City minimum storm sewer size for public roads is 15” and must be RCP. Include <br />storm sewer pipe material on utilities sheets. <br />a.Pipe from ST-108A to ST-108 must be increased to 15” diameter. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Storm Sewer within roadway has been updated to be a <br />minimum of 15”. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />14.Structure types and sizes should be called out for Wilkinson Way storm sewer. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Structure Types and Sizes for sewer within Wilkinson <br />way have been added to the plans. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />15.Show storm sewer in profile view along Wilkinson Way to ensure there are no utility <br />conflicts. <br />a.Utility crossings should be checked across the site to ensure there are no <br />conflicts and to call out insulation as needed. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Storm Sewer has been added to the profile of Wilkinson <br />Way on the Final Plans. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. No conflicts appear to be present <br />and insulation is called out in storm profile view. <br />16.Ensure structure diameters are sized properly for alignments with pipes at acute <br />angles or with large diameter pipes. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Storm Structure diameters were updated. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Check constructability of structures with large diameter <br />(>21”) pipes. For example, ST-202 with a 36” RCP and 42” RCP at 90° is not likely <br />constructable as a 48” structure. <br />WSB Response (9/4/2025) – Remains an open comment even though pipes into ST- <br />202 have changed. <br />17.What is the purpose for structure ST-2? <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – ST-2 was removed per grading updates. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />18.How will the low points at driveways into Buildings A and B be drained? <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Trench drains were added to the utility drawing. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />19.Indicate tip-out gutter as needed to ensure pooling is avoided in upgradient portions <br />of parking lots. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Reverse curb gutter callouts have been added to the <br />plans. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />20.ST-304 should be moved to the corner of the nearest parking stall rather than on the <br />curb radius. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – ST-304 was moved to the end of the nearest parking <br />stall. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />21.It is recommended to route ST-201 directly to FES-4A to avoid daylighting drainage <br />and potentially flooding onto the proposed trail. <br />ISG Response (6/9/2025) – Storm Sewer was updated to convey stormwater directly <br />to the basin. <br />WSB Response (6/20/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />22.The OCS details on sheet C0-26 do not match HydroCAD modeling. <br />ISG Response (6/9/2025) - Detail has been updated to match the HydroCAD <br />modeling. <br />WSB Response (6/20/2025) – The weir wall is modeled as 5’, though the detail <br />shows a 6’ diameter structure. Additionally, the rain garden outlet rim elevations/pipe <br />Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review <br /> <br />