My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2025
>
09/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2025 3:04:44 PM
Creation date
9/5/2025 3:04:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/10/2025
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />09/04/2025 <br />Page 4 <br />being completed by Water in Motion and will be supplied to the City and VLAWMO <br />for review. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Noted, please provide water reuse report when <br />available. <br />4.The steepest allowable slope below the 10’ aquatic bench is 3:1. Current grading of <br />2:1 is too steep and must be revised. <br />ISG Response (6/9/2025) – Grading below the aquatic bench was revised to 3:1 <br />slopes. <br />WSB Response (6/20/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />5.The outlet pipe for Basin 1 must be submerged at least 1’ below the NWL. <br />a.Considering this basin is intended for irrigation reuse, the outlet pipe should <br />be set such that it is submerged even at the lowest planned water elevation. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Invert of the outlet pipe has been updated. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – While submerged for the stated NWL, outlet pipe invert <br />should be set according to lowest planned water elevation in the water reuse report. <br />WSB Response (9/4/2025) – Remains an open comment. <br />6.An impervious clay liner should be specified below Basin 1 as geotech borings in and <br />around the pond show some sandy/silty soils that may infiltrate water meant for <br />irrigation reuse. This will be evaluated with the next submittal. <br />ISG Response (6/9/2025) – Noted. <br />WSB Response (6/20/2025) – Clay liner noted on pond detail. <br />7.Tree plantings are not recommended on the Basin 1 berm as root growth may <br />weaken its integrity over time. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Noted, tree plantings have been removed from the top <br />of the berm.. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />8.All BMPs and site depressions need to show EOF locations and elevations. <br />ISG Response (6/9/2025) – Addressed. <br />WSB Response (6/20/2025) – EOFs shown. <br />9.Curb cuts must have rock stabilization over the flow path to BMPs. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Addressed. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />10.Wilkinson Way will be a public road so inlet spread and run calcs, in particular at sag <br />points, must be provided and ensure an 8’ drivable lane during the 3-year storm <br />event. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Storm sewer inlets spread calculation was calculated <br />using the 3-yr stm event, calculations are included in the stormwater report. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Provided calculations do not include spread extents. <br />Intake efficiency does not indicate how far into the roadway water will spread during <br />the storm event. Additionally, allowable sag depths of 0.5’ and 1’ would result in <br />ponded water up to and over the crown of the road per the given typical section. This <br />does not provide a center 8’ drivable lane. The provided calculations also appear to <br />be for a 10-year event, not 3-year. <br />WSB Response (9/4/2025) – Remains an open comment. <br />11.All proposed pipe serving Wilkinson Way must have supporting calculations to <br />ensure there is capacity for conveying the 10-year storm event. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Storm sewer was sized using the 10-yr stm event, <br />calculations are included in the stormwater report. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed, pipe capacity is sufficient.. <br />12.The maximum pipe velocity is 10 ft/sec and the minimum is 3 ft/sec. <br />ISG Response (7/14/2025) – Noted, these design considerations have been <br />addressed. <br />WSB Response (8/6/2025) – Comment addressed. <br />Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.