Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 4, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br />91 A presentation was given on a screen, showing the systems elements and examples of <br />92 functions. <br />93 <br />94 Administrator Karlson added his support to implementing a Cartegraph system for the <br />95 city. In addition to what's already been pointed out, he sees that the system will allow <br />96 better tracking of labor costs. <br />97 <br />98 When the mayor asked if the program would work well in tracking police and fire <br />99 Department equipment, the WSB representative said the city of Maple Grove tried that <br />100 type of use with mixed results. Council Member Roeser led a discussion on routes used <br />101 by public works equipment and the possibility of saving money by GPSing equipment. <br />102 <br />103 Director DeGardner said with the council's authorization he would proceed to bring the <br />104 system to the city. A budget amendment for costs would come sometime in the future. <br />105 He noted the on -site training that would be included in implementation. The mayor <br />106 recommended that the council should receive regular reports — to be able to follow the <br />107 efficiencies created along the way. <br />108 <br />109 Council Member Stoesz asked about future data ownership. What happens if it moves <br />110 off the cloud? The WSB representative responded that you can pull data down from the <br />111 cloud site and it is quite system specific. Council Member Stoesz added that he wants to <br />112 see that the contract for this system includes a specific clause that requires the data to <br />113 remain in the United States. Further he would like to see the "Your Gov" element up <br />114 early in implementation. <br />115 <br />116 The council concurred to move forward with the Cartegraph project. <br />117 <br />118 4. 2014 — 2016 Water and Sewer Rates <br />119 5.2014 Water, Sewer and Program Recreation Budget Proposals - Finance Director <br />120 Rolek reviewed the proposed enterprise budget for the city's water and sewer funds, <br />121 including capital outlay. He indicated the status of each of the funds both with and <br />122 without a rate adjustment. He discussed when rates were last adjusted. <br />123 <br />124 The council discussed the water and sewer infrastructure. The mayor noted that the main <br />125 topic of discussion for the council is really the budget and the need to adjust. The cost of <br />126 sewer is tied to the Metropolitan Council charges and that increases by about 3 percent <br />127 every year and so it is not under city control; the mayor asked how much of the proposed <br />128 increase covers the Metropolitan Council charges and Mr. Rolek explained that is about <br />129 $800,000 and the rest is related to increased costs for personnel, supplies, depreciation, <br />130 debt service and capital outlay. In discussing the water budget, costs are increasing <br />131 primarily because of capital outlay (at a rate of about $39,000 per year). Mr. Rolek <br />132 explained that it is a city goal to include capital replacements in rates but in the past few <br />133 years, that isn't the case. <br />134 <br />3 <br />