My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/13/2012 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
02/13/2012 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 12:42:28 PM
Creation date
1/6/2014 3:59:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/13/2012
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Background <br />In a 2006 Quality of Life Survey, 60% of respondents favored changing the Lino Lakes <br />City Charter so that the City Council can plan and fund the reconstruction of streets in a <br />responsible manner. The sentiment was echoed throughout the 2030 visioning process <br />(September 2006- February 2007) in a public forum and in visioning issue team <br />discussions, resulting in a 2030 Vision Plan recommendation to change the charter. The <br />2030 Plan also stated that a citizen's group should initiate the effort. <br />Citizen's Task Force Created by City Council <br />In February 2007 the Lino Lakes City Council adopted Resolution No. 07 -30 (see <br />Appendix A) appointing the 2030 Visioning Committee to form a task force from its <br />members. The 2030 group was made up of citizens randomly selected from the <br />community. Seven interested members of the Visioning Committee formed the Citizen's <br />Task Force, which was charged with studying the charter's impact on the Council's <br />ability to manage streets and consider the need for an amendment. Over the past four <br />months, the task force met 14 times. Detailed information on the Task Force is available <br />at www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us. <br />Task Force Process <br />The Citizen's Task Force to Review Charter Provisions Pertaining to Local <br />Improvements began meeting in March with a series of presentations that provided <br />background information on the City's Pavement Management Plan, financing <br />recommendations to fund projects in the plan, a comparison of statutory and charter <br />cities, and the process for assessing the costs of public improvements under state statutes <br />and under Lino Lakes' charter. In an effort to hear from all stakeholders in this issue, <br />joint meetings were held with members of the Charter Commission, City administrators, <br />and members of the City Council. Public comment was taken at a public forum and <br />through the city's website. <br />The Issue and Its Significance <br />At issue are the city's authority and apparent inability to reconstruct its streets —a vital <br />public improvement and infrastructure asset —in the most responsible, timely and cost - <br />effective manner. Lino Lakes has 84 miles of paved roads valued at $90 million —a <br />significant asset that is in the city's best interest to preserve in order to provide for the <br />safe and efficient travel of its citizens, retain property values, keep the city attractive and <br />desirable, and minimize costs to property owners and taxpayers. <br />In its Pavement Management Plan, the city has outlined a schedule for the reconstruction <br />of roads rated "problem" (see Figure 1) and a financing plan that would pay for the <br />reconstruction at the lowest cost overall (see Appendix B), yet the city has not been able <br />to fully execute the plan because of provisions in Section 8 of the Charter. Current <br />charter provisions for referendum force a citywide election for each localized street <br />reconstruction project rather than having issues be resolved by affected property owners <br />and the City Council. Referendums failed in 2003 and 2005. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.