Laserfiche WebLink
Why This Issue Needs to be Resolved <br />This issue needs to be resolved because of: <br />1. Financial reasons <br />o Increased costs to the city and taxpayers <br />o Problem continues to compound because streets continue to deteriorate <br />because of lack of reconstruction <br />o Wasted feasibility studies <br />2. Safety and liability concerns <br />3. Public support for changing the charter <br />1. Financial Reasons <br />Increased Costs to the City and Taxpayers <br />As a result of the failed referendums, the projected timely reconstruction of streets hasn't <br />begun, forsaking a potential savings of $11 million (see Figure 2). This backlog of <br />reconstruction projects cannot be ignored. Inflation drives up the cost of reconstruction <br />every year due to higher costs for labor and construction materials. An example of the <br />cost of deferring reconstruction is West Shadow Lake Drive. According to the city's <br />Pavement Management Report, "The estimated cost of reconstruction in 2005 was <br />$2,375,700. It is estimated the 2008 costs would be $2,750,000 due to increases in <br />construction costs." (Source: Pavement Management Report, 2004, Page 12) <br />Problem Continues to Compound <br />Roads have a life span. Even with proper maintenance, they eventually wear out and need <br />to be rebuilt. In Lino Lakes, 11 miles of roads are at that critical stage. The city's <br />Pavement Management Report shows that streets will continue to deteriorate. As a <br />result, the number of miles requiring reconstruction will increase. If streets already <br />identified as needing reconstruction aren't completed and removed from the list, the <br />number of projects and expenses will grow, compounding the problem. Over time, the <br />financial burden could become so great that the city would never be able to manage it. <br />Citizens should be concerned that the city can't, with any predictability, complete <br />reconstruction projects in a timely manner using the most cost - effective financing <br />available. <br />Wasted Feasibility Studies <br />Every proposed reconstruction project requires a feasibility study. The cost of the study <br />varies depending upon existing conditions, existing information and the size of the <br />project. Studies are good for 5 -10 years though if voters turn down a project, it may need <br />to be updated. The chart below shows the cost of studies and updates for upcoming <br />projects. <br />Project <br />Cost of Initial Feasibility Study <br />Cost to Update <br />Shenandoah <br />$30,000 <br />$3,000 <br />West Shadow Lake Drive <br />$55,000 <br />$4,500 <br />Source: Lino Lakes City Engineer <br />Affected property owners absorb feasibility costs if a project moves forward. If voted <br />down, money required for the study is wasted. <br />3 <br />