My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/26/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
03/26/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 1:08:48 PM
Creation date
1/7/2014 10:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/26/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 5, 2012 P1 8 <br />DRAFT <br />178 The mayor noted the change regarding new impervious surface requirements from the <br />179 Comprehensive Plan — going from 65 percent to 40 percent. He wants to talk about <br />180 possible issues, perhaps with something like a swimming pool and he'd like to know the <br />181 impact of this change on real people living in the city. Mr. Bengtson noted that the city <br />182 doesn't normally see anything near the percentages unless the shoreline ordinance comes <br />183 into play. <br />184 <br />185 The mayor noted that he disagrees with the change to a standard footprint as it's a big <br />186 difference between a one and two level with the same footprint. It could hurt people <br />187 buying lots and it doesn't protect the neighbors. He agrees with the changes to the <br />188 footprint size but doesn't like one standard. A council member concurred with the mayor <br />189 and also mentioned concerns about losing buffers with the setbacks. Mr. Grochala <br />190 suggested that he'd like to review more background information on the setback matter <br />191 before changes are made and it would have to be run through the Planning and Zoning <br />192 Board again if changed. He suggested that the issue come back as a separate ordinance <br />193 after further review as a separate consideration and the council concurred. The council <br />194 briefly discussed the manufactured home park section and was told by staff that cities <br />195 cannot ban the structures under zoning law but the homes would still have to meet other <br />196 city requirements. Staff is recommending the use be added to certain districts as a <br />197 conditional use and the council recommended that the matter be held off of the ordinance <br />198 for more discussion. <br />199 <br />200 Review Regular Agenda — The agenda for the upcoming council meeting on March 12, <br />201 2012 was reviewed. There were no changes to the agenda. <br />202 <br />203 The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. <br />204 <br />205 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on <br />206 March 26, 2012. <br />207 <br />208 <br />209 <br />210 <br />211 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor <br />212 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.