Laserfiche WebLink
P15 <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION June 4, 2012 <br />DRAFT <br />135 There are two elements that are being recommended: Laserfiche Weblink to bring the <br />136 packet to the council members and iAnnotate as a reader program to enhance electronic <br />137 use. She demonstrated on the iPad how the city council packet can be produced in <br />138 electronic form, linked to the Web using the Weblinks program, and opened on the iPad. <br />139 She noted that staffs recommendation to utilize the Laserfiche Weblinks element in part <br />140 is because Laserfiche is the tool that the city has chosen to utilize for the organization <br />141 wide document imaging program. Therefore using an element of Laserfiche for the <br />142 packets makes sense for compatibility and streamlining. She then demonstrated the <br />143 search capability of the program. <br />144 <br />145 Council Member Stoesz summarized that Laserfiche is the recommended tool because it <br />146 is the overall program being used by the city for its documents. It is easily integrated and <br />147 is similar in function to the current Web. The idea of all council members using an iPad <br />148 is to give a uniform look and, for use, so that everyone has pretty much the same access <br />149 and tools. He asked how members would be notified of changes to the packet <br />150 (SharePoint has a notification ability)? It would be nice to receive an automatic message <br />151 whenever the document is updated (rather than having to email every time). Clerk Bartell <br />152 noted that she will specifically discuss the communication element with the IT group. <br />153 She added that staffs goal is to keep improving the process — a scanned PDF is not the <br />154 ultimate goal. <br />155 <br />156 Stoesz noted that he's discussed with staff the installation of extra wireless nodes to <br />157 assure dedicated bandwidth for council meetings, in case there is ever a lack of necessary <br />158 bandwidth during a meeting. Also it would have to be an expectation that council <br />159 members will have their device charged and ready for the meeting. City Clerk Bartell <br />160 said she envisions a clear plan of instruction of use and training as necessary, dealing with <br />161 all the details. Staff will also be looking into how to handle Apple accounts for the <br />162 purchase of applications. Stoesz recommended that staff also look at utilizing the iPad <br />163 as a recording device. <br />164 <br />165 City Administrator Karlson noted that if the council wants to move forward with the <br />166 program, the remaining question then would be funding. There are different options — <br />167 monthly stipends, city purchase, or what Roseville is doing — giving $500 up front to each <br />168 person authorized. Roseville has gone with the less expensive iPad 2 (at $400) because it <br />169 is fine for this purpose. The extra funds allows for the purchase of applications. He <br />170 clarified that if the unit is purchased by stipend, the individual would own it. <br />171 <br />172 The council discussed the implications of having a public device and how they can keep <br />173 public data separate from personal. O'Donnell's preference is that the city purchases the <br />174 unit as well as the software; when a council member leaves service it is returned. <br />175 Rafferty suggested his preference would probably be toward the stipend. <br />176 <br />177 City Clerk Bartell suggested that the rollout would most likely include use at a work <br />178 session first prior to use at a council meeting. Administrator Karlson suggested that <br />179 initially the council could have a paper backup next to the iPad. <br />4 <br />• <br />