Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES October 22, 2012 <br />DRAFT <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 DATE : October 22, 2012 <br />6 TIME STARTED : 6:35 p.m. <br />7 TIME ENDED : 8:30 p.m. <br />8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell, Rafferty, <br />9 Roeser, and Mayor Reinert <br />10 MEMBERS ABSENT : none <br />11 <br />12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael <br />13 Grochala; Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; Finance Director Al Rolek; Chief <br />14 of Police John Swenson; City Attorney Joseph Langel; and City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />15 <br />16 PUBLIC COMMENT <br />17 <br />18 No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. <br />19 <br />20 SETTING THE AGENDA <br />21 <br />22 The agenda was approved as presented. <br />23 <br />24 SPECIAL PRESENTATION <br />25 <br />26 Charter Amendment Update — Community Development Director Grochala spoke to the question <br />27 of what would change if the proposed charter amendment is passed this fall. He explained that the <br />28 process for public improvement projects is still outlined in state law and the city charter and the <br />29 amendment would just tweak the process. The process for proposal of projects would not change; <br />30 the public hearing process with notification of property owners would not change. With the change, <br />31 an additional hearing is called for based on neighborhood input to give time to work on concerns. <br />32 After hearings the ability of a project to go forward still rests with the neighborhood. Finally the <br />33 community as a whole can petition to stop a project. He noted that information on the amendment is <br />34 available on the city's Web site, at a kiosk at city hall and through a public service program on the <br />35 city cable channel. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Reinert announced his support for the charter amendment. He clarified that the process under <br />38 discussion is for neighborhood roads, not the county or state roads we sometimes see under <br />39 construction in the city. The process proposed is a fair balance and gives residents more influence on <br />40 the work impacting them and as well maintains the integrity of the city charter. <br />41 <br />42 CONSENT AGENDA <br />43 <br />44 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1G, as presented. <br />45 Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />