My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/13/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
11/13/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 4:12:11 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 11:03:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/13/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES October 22, 2012 <br />DRAFT <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 DATE : October 22, 2012 <br />6 TIME STARTED : 6:35 p.m. <br />7 TIME ENDED : 8:30 p.m. <br />8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell, Rafferty, <br />9 Roeser, and Mayor Reinert <br />10 MEMBERS ABSENT : none <br />11 <br />12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael <br />13 Grochala; Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; Finance Director Al Rolek; Chief <br />14 of Police John Swenson; City Attorney Joseph Langel; and City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />15 <br />16 PUBLIC COMMENT <br />17 <br />18 No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. <br />19 <br />20 SETTING THE AGENDA <br />21 <br />22 The agenda was approved as presented. <br />23 <br />24 SPECIAL PRESENTATION <br />25 <br />26 Charter Amendment Update — Community Development Director Grochala spoke to the question <br />27 of what would change if the proposed charter amendment is passed this fall. He explained that the <br />28 process for public improvement projects is still outlined in state law and the city charter and the <br />29 amendment would just tweak the process. The process for proposal of projects would not change; <br />30 the public hearing process with notification of property owners would not change. With the change, <br />31 an additional hearing is called for based on neighborhood input to give time to work on concerns. <br />32 After hearings the ability of a project to go forward still rests with the neighborhood. Finally the <br />33 community as a whole can petition to stop a project. He noted that information on the amendment is <br />34 available on the city's Web site, at a kiosk at city hall and through a public service program on the <br />35 city cable channel. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Reinert announced his support for the charter amendment. He clarified that the process under <br />38 discussion is for neighborhood roads, not the county or state roads we sometimes see under <br />39 construction in the city. The process proposed is a fair balance and gives residents more influence on <br />40 the work impacting them and as well maintains the integrity of the city charter. <br />41 <br />42 CONSENT AGENDA <br />43 <br />44 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1G, as presented. <br />45 Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.