Laserfiche WebLink
Engineering Review <br />'ox Den Acres <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />• <br />Page 2 <br />December 8, 2004 <br />2. As a result of the plan revision, the site layout, grading, stormwater routing, and utilities have been <br />adjusted in some locations. Revised drainage calculations have also been submitted. <br />3. Of the 50 acres, approximately 75% is upland or developable, while the remainder is pockets of <br />wetlands scattered throughout the property or portions of DNR Wetland No. 565P, which borders the <br />south and east edge of the properties. According to the information provided, the Ordinary High <br />Water Level of the wetland is 893.0, and the Flood Zone limits have been indicated on the survey in <br />accordance with the local Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated May 17, 1982. A ponding and flowage <br />easement in favor of the City of Lino Lakes (Document No. 595478), corresponding roughly to the <br />Flood Zone limits, is also indicated on the Plan. A Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) will <br />ultimately be required to perform the improvements as proposed. <br />4. A Resource Inventory Survey has also been prepared for this site. The site is generally undulating <br />with mixtures of wooded areas, pasture, and wetlands. According to records of a Soil Survey by the <br />USDA Soil Conservation service, the soils are generally fine sands and fine sandy loams with the <br />exception of areas of muck in the vicinity of the lower flood plain areas. A Geotechnical Report as <br />referenced above has also been provided and provides the following observations of note: <br />a) Glacial outwash deposits of fine sand dominate the area. <br />b) In the lowland areas, a black organic topsoil has developed, varying in thickness from 1 to <br />3.25 feet at the test pits. The total thickness of organic topsoil in the lowland areas was not <br />explored. This should especially be taken into consideration where utilities and roadways <br />traverse through lowland areas. <br />c) The majority of test pits and test borings exhibited soil mottling which was used to assist in <br />determining seasonal high ground water levels. <br />Grading and Drainage <br />1. A General Stormwater Discharge Permit, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will be <br />required in accordance with the most current requirements of NPDES Phase II and State of <br />Minnesota regulations. All NPDES regulations and requirements in accordance with the MPCA shall <br />be adhered to, including submittal to the City of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). <br />2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control must be enforced at all times during the course of all grading and <br />utility work. This includes the establishment of silt fence around all graded and disturbed areas, and <br />the sweeping of streets on a regular basis, and as directed by the City. As per RCWD requirements, <br />the grading plan must also be revised to specify inlet protection for the proposed catch basins. <br />In the event the Contractor does not maintain erosion control as required, any costs incurred by the <br />City as a result will be withheld from escrows or other monies due. It is strongly suggested that a note <br />be added to all construction plan sheets (including grading, streets, and utilities) reminding the <br />Contractor to address erosion control requirements. <br />3. The Grading Plan indicates that wetlands shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio per requirements of the <br />Wetland Conservation Act. The Plans also must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District <br />(RCWD). A permit application has been submitted to RCWD (Permit No. 04 -039, dated March 12, <br />-41- <br />• <br />