My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/06/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
04/06/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 2:52:05 PM
Creation date
1/16/2014 9:48:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/06/2005
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Charter Commission <br />October 14, 2004 <br />Page 6 <br />DRAFT <br />The Commission agreed to not officially ask to be on the City Council Worksession agenda, but <br />would wait until the Council had made their decisions before a meeting would be requested. <br />Chair Trehus asked what form the Commissioners wanted to communicate their motion. The <br />Commission agreed that Chair Trehus would draft a letter to the City Administrator and Council <br />informing them of this Motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Commissioner Handrick stated she would contact the Minnesota League of Cities to obtain <br />infouuation on how other Charter Cities paid for reconstruction of their road and would report <br />back to the Commission at the next meeting. <br />Commission Members Not Receiving City Council Minutes — Commissioner Dahl stated the <br />Commissioner members could obtain the City Council Minutes from the City website. <br />Commissioner Carlson stated he has not been receiving any minutes and he wanted a hard copy <br />of both the City Council Minutes and Worksession Minutes. Commissioner Dahl replied she <br />would inform Ann Blair of this. <br />Review City Council Meeting Minutes for Charter Compliance — Chair Trehus asked if any <br />Commissions had found any issues. The Commissioner's had no comments. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Charter Commission Budget (Commissioner Dahl) - Commissioner Dahl handed out the <br />budget to the Commission and reviewed it for the Commission. She stated there was a deduction <br />for the use of an attorney, which she did not believe was accurate. She noted there was no <br />budget for Timesavers, which has now been added. She stated she believed staff had gone to <br />several attorneys and talk about the road issue, but she wanted the Commissioners to know it was <br />not the Charter that did this. She stated staff had told her that since it was regarding road <br />reconstruction, it could be taken out of the Charter budget, but in her opinion, they should have <br />asked the Charter Commission if they could do that. She asked the Commission what they <br />wanted to do about this. <br />Commissioner Stroberg asked which attorney was paid and for what. <br />Chair Trehus replied he would check with City staff for this information and he would give an <br />update at the next meeting. <br />Chair Carlson stated he was skeptical when it came to the budget and he did not feel the <br />• attomey's fees being taken out of the Commission's budget was right. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.