My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/22/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
06/22/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 3:50:59 PM
Creation date
1/17/2014 12:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/22/2005
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />YMCA Financing Options <br />June 22, 2005, page 3 <br />The City may ask the County or School to abate their share of taxes if the <br />planned expenditure also benefits these entities. There is a 20 year limit if at <br />least one other entity declines the City's request to participate. If all three entities <br />participate, or if the City participates alone without requesting participation from <br />other taxing jurisdictions, the time limit is 15 years. The abatement may be <br />phased in with the Village project so that the levy is offset by added tax base. <br />The maximum abatement cannot exceed 10% of the City's levy (not including <br />debt levy). The City has sufficient capacity under this authority. GO abatement <br />bonds do not count against the City's debt limit and will allow the City to obtain <br />lower interest rates. <br />The abatement could last 15 years with an average annual levy of $155,000 or <br />last 20 years with an average annual levy of $130,000. Since there is sufficient <br />property growth projected to absorb the additional costs, we are recommending <br />that the City use a 15 year time frame to repay the bonds in order to maintain <br />financial flexibility in the future. <br />Under separate cover, Steve Bubul, Kennedy & Graven, has opined that the abatement tool to <br />finance the City's share of the YMCA is an appropriate use and meets the legal requirements <br />necessary to allow creation of the abatement. From a financial standpoint, Springsted believes <br />that abatement bonds are most advantageous for this portion of the transaction in that (1) it <br />produces the lowest interest rate possible (2) it is a simple transaction compared to a lease <br />transaction (3) the abatement levy is offset by growth anticipated in the Village project and (4) <br />the authority for an abatement for this project already exists in State law. <br />Assisting the YMCA with Financing their Share of the Facility <br />We have also been asked to consider ways that the City could assist in financing the YMCA's <br />portion of $2,500,000. There are good reasons for the City to consider such assistance, <br />especially where it allows some control or protection of the City's initial investment. We have <br />looked at two options. <br />1) Lease Revenue Bonds <br />a. Lease Revenue Bonds could be issued by the City and repaid by a lease <br />payment from the YMCA to cover 100% of the debt. The interest rate would be <br />20 to 30 basis points higher than a GO backed bond and a debt service reserve <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.