My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/22/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
06/22/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 3:50:59 PM
Creation date
1/17/2014 12:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/22/2005
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />YMCA Financing Options <br />June 22, 2005, page 4 <br />would be required. In the case of a default, the City would be expected to levy <br />for the remaining outstanding bonds, but is not obligated to do so. If the City <br />assumes responsibility for the payments, the City would then own the facility and <br />the land. A default would impact the City's bond rating. The YMCA is providing <br />$3,000,000 of funding upfront which lessens the likelihood of default. While this <br />option protects the City's initial investment, it also requires the City to issue <br />bonds to cover more than just their commitment. <br />2) Tax Exempt Private Debt <br />a. Bonds would be issued by the City and repaid solely from loan payments <br />pledged by the YMCA. There would be no obligation to the City legally or implied <br />as long as due diligence was met prior to issuing the bonds. The interest rate <br />would be 20 to 30 basis points higher than a GO backed bond and a debt service <br />reserve would be required. The documents may be structured to allow the City <br />first right of refusal in the case of default, but that would require agreement by the <br />YMCA, trustee and bondholders. The City may choose to issue bonds to pay off <br />conduit debt if it decided to own and operate the facility. The bond documents <br />would provide for this. Any default by the YMCA would not impact the City's <br />credit rating. The YMCA has a strong credit history and the likelihood of default is <br />remote. The YMCA's financial statements for this project would be made public. <br />Both options for the $2.500,000 YMCA financed share provide tax exempt financing which <br />provides cost savings to the City's partner, the YMCA. While there are benefits to both options, <br />the most appropriate tool depends on whether the City would like to issue direct debt to finance <br />the YMCA's share of debt to insure their ability to control the facility if the YMCA defaults, or if <br />the City would like to issue conduit debt and then decide whether to be responsible for the <br />$2,500,000 share, should a default occur. <br />We recommend pursuing the Tax Exempt Private Debt option (conduit debt) because it <br />eliminates any risk to the City's credit rating. Bond Counsel is comfortable issuing GO <br />Abatement Bond to finance the same facility that is being privately financed. We condition this <br />recommendation on the bondholder agreeing to grant the City a right of first refusal to protect <br />the City's investment. The YMCA is currently in discussions with banks and has asked the City <br />to commit to issuing less than $10 million of bonds in 2005 so that the Tax Exempt Private Debt <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.