Laserfiche WebLink
P27 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />46 Access Agreement for Monitoring Well <br />47 <br />48 Resolution No. 11 -44, Temporary On -Sale Liquor <br />49 License for American Legion Post 566 <br />50 <br />51 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK <br />52 <br />53 There was no report from the Finance Department. <br />54 <br />55 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH <br />56 <br />57 3A) Connectivity Services Agreement with Anoka County for Broadband Services - <br />58 Administrator Karlson noted that the council has heard from representatives from Anoka County on <br />59 this proposal to develop a county -wide fiber network. This is a county led initiative to increase the <br />60 amount of fiber optic service in Anoka County utilizing a partnership with a private company, Zayo <br />61 Bandwidth. The project has received a federal grant of $13.4 million to provide for the installation <br />62 and equipment that would link 145 anchor institutions and provide a backbone connecting police, fire, <br />63 schools, city halls, etc. within the county. The network would also provide a direct advantage to <br />64 businesses and economic development in the area through faster and more reliable internet services. <br />65 The network itself will be owned and operated by Zayo. Before the council for consideration is an <br />66 agreement for connectivity service with Anoka County; the agreement itself involves no cost to the <br />67 city. The city may choose to hook up to the system in the future and the fees are noted in comparison <br />68 to current service fees. Again the agreement includes no cost to the city for installation of equipment <br />69 and maintenance is included to year 2017. The city would have services available at three locations: <br />70 city hall, the fire station and the public works facility. Mr. Karlson added that the North Metro <br />71 Communications attorney has reviewed the agreement and has met with Anoka County officials and <br />72 has provided a memorandum explaining his findings. Staff is recommending approval of the <br />73 agreement to preserve the city's option of connecting to the network in the future. <br />74 <br />75 The council requested that further discussion of costs related to the system be placed on the next work <br />76 session agenda. Even if execution of the contract is authorized at the meeting this evening, the <br />77 council would like to review further the contract details. Administrator Karlson clarified that the <br />78 contract presented for consideration now is about allowing the fiber to be placed; connectivity is a <br />79 choice the city can make down the line. A council member noted that he still has some questions <br />80 about this project and he is not convinced that the redundancy is needed and that the government <br />81 should be spending the money (including the federal government). The mayor remarked that it's <br />82 also important for the city to look ahead and understand what costs could possibly lay ahead; he <br />83 respects the council member's comment on the expense of the project and also sees that costs will <br />84 only rise down the line, that a monopoly in the service area is not good and that this project could be <br />85 advantageous to the city. <br />86 <br />87 Council Member Gallup moved to authorize execution of the contract as recommended. Council <br />88 Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Roeser voted nay. <br />89 <br />90 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, KENT STREGE <br />91 <br />92 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. <br />April 11, 2011 <br />Approved <br />Approved <br />2 <br />