Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES April 11, 2011 P 2 8 <br />DRAFT <br />93 <br />94 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />95 <br />96 There was no report from the Public Services Department. <br />97 <br />98 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />99 <br />100 6A) 2 "d Reading of Ordinance No 08 -11 amending Chapter 1010 of the City Code regarding <br />101 regulation of signs in election years- City Planner Smyser noted that the council approved first <br />102 reading of the ordinance on March 14. At that time the period of sign regulation previous to <br />103 municipal elections was changed from 46 to 30 days. Staff is recommending that the council proceed <br />104 with second reading and passage of the ordinance. <br />105 <br />106 Council Member Roeser noted that he originally felt that the sign regulation period should be <br />107 consistent with the voting period (absentee included) but that period has recently been changed to 46 <br />108 days previous to elections (an increase from 25 days currently). He shares the concern he's heard <br />109 from other council members about the cluttering of signs and their lack of enthusiasm at increasing <br />110 the period, however he also has some concern about allowing voter education for the whole voting <br />111 period. He spoke with the League of Minnesota Cities and was informed that some cities are <br />112 providing voter information by allowing links to candidate information on their website (for the full <br />113 voting period). When the city attorney was asked for his opinion on that practice, Mr. Langel <br />114 suggested that it would be legal and comes down to a web site policy question for the city. <br />115 <br />116 Council Member O'Donnell moved to dispense with full reading of the ordinance. Council Member <br />117 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />118 <br />119 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the second reading and passage of Ordinance No. 08 -11 <br />120 as presented. Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. <br />121 <br />122 6B) 2011 Street Maintenance Projects: <br />123 i. Consider Resolution No. 11 -41, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2011 <br />124 Overlay Project <br />125 ii. Consider Resolution No. 11 -42, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2011 <br />126 Sealcoat Project <br />127 <br />128 City Engineer Studenski noted the bid process and opening for each of the projects. Low bidders were <br />129 noted as well as their bids in comparison with the engineer's estimate. <br />130 <br />131 A council member confirmed that the low bidders are companies that the city has worked with before <br />132 and that the proposed project costs are a good bargain for the city. A council member also confirmed <br />133 that the city has an adequate budget to deal with potholes this year. A council member noted recent <br />134 information about salt damage and requested a future discussion about the city's use of roadway salt. <br />135 <br />136 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 11 -41 as presented. Council Member <br />137 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />3 <br />