My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/13/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
06/13/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 12:44:23 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 12:41:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/13/2011
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P24 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES May 23, 2011 <br />DRAFT <br />46 <br />47 May 2, 2011 Council Work Session <br />48 Minutes Approved <br />49 <br />50 May 9, 2011 Council Meeting Minutes Approved <br />51 <br />52 April 25, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes Approved <br />53 <br />54 May 9, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes Approved <br />55 <br />56 Resolution No. 11 -54 approving a special event <br />57 and temporary liquor permit for benefit event at <br />58 American Legion Post 566 Approved <br />59 <br />60 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK <br />61 <br />62 There was no report from the Finance Department. <br />63 <br />64 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH <br />65 <br />66 There was no report from the Administration Department. <br />67 <br />68 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, JOHN SWENSON <br />69 <br />70 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. <br />71 <br />72 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />73 <br />74 There was no report from the Public Services Department. <br />75 <br />76 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />77 <br />78 6A) Resolution No. 11 -49, Preliminary approval of revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for <br />79 submittal to Metropolitan Council — City Planner Smyser reported that the resolution would give <br />80 preliminary approval to the comprehensive plan document as it has been revised and reviewed by the <br />81 council. He reviewed the revision process and resulting changes to the document. If the resolution is <br />82 approved, the document will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and returned to the city for <br />83 final adoption in the future. <br />84 <br />85 Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 11 -49 as presented. Council Member <br />86 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />87 <br />88 6Bj— Resolut- ion - Nis i -53 - Aceepting- repor# -of- for - Redevelopment -T- ask - Force --- Economic <br />89 Development Coordinator Divine noted that the council originally requested that the city's Economic <br />90 Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) act as a redevelopment task force to look at issues <br />91 surrounding under- utilized properties in the city. A report has been put together outlining identified <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.