Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />CC MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM 6Ai <br />Paul Bengtson <br />October 10, 2011 <br />Consider Resolution Number 11 -95 <br />Conditional Use Permit Amendment <br />Motor Fuel Station, 7997 Lake Drive <br />The site at the southwest corner of Lake Drive and Main Street had gas pumps <br />for many years. The canopy, pumps, and underground storage tanks were <br />removed in 2009 and the convenience store space has been vacant since then. <br />The property owner wants to install a new canopy with gas pumps and fuel tanks. <br />The location of the canopy and pumps on the site will differ from the previously <br />approved layout. This requires amending the existing motor fuel station <br />conditional use permit. An amendment to an existing conditional use permit <br />requires the same process as a new one. <br />The installation of a new canopy, fuel pumps, and underground storage tanks will <br />require excavation and repaving of the site, including an increase in impervious <br />area. The Lake Drive access driveway will be moved south and align with the <br />bank driveway on the other side of Lake Drive. There will be no structural <br />changes to the existing building. <br />ANALYSIS <br />History <br />The site has had motor fuel pumps for decades. A building permit for fuel pumps <br />and storage tanks was issued in 1978. The 1971 zoning ordinance lists motor <br />fuel station as a permitted use. The 1982 zoning ordinance lists motor fuel <br />station as a conditional use. Existing uses were considered to have a conditional <br />use permit (CUP) that allowed them to continue as they were at the time. <br />Structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use required an amendment <br />to the CUP. This was observed when an application in 1999 to increase the <br />number of fuel pumps and enlarge the canopy was processed as an amendment <br />to a CUP. (The application was withdrawn.) In fact, this same approach remains <br />and is required by our current zoning ordinance. We are considering the current <br />application as an amendment to a CUP. <br />P62 <br />