My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/07/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
11/07/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 2:03:23 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 11:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/07/2011
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />1st Reading: <br />Publication: <br />2nd Reading: <br />Effective: <br />Council Member <br />moved for adoption of the following ordinance: <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ORDINANCE NO. 21 -11 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO <br />ADD ACCESSORY OUTDOOR STORAGE AS AN INTERIM USE IN THE LIGHT <br />INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT <br />Section 1 Findings <br />Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires consideration of possible <br />adverse effects of a proposed zoning amendment and that the judgment of a proposed <br />amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall be based upon, but not limited to, the <br />following factors: <br />1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies <br />and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />The sites where this use would be allowed must be zoned and guided <br />Industrial. The owner would need to obtain an Interim Use Permit, <br />which must, by ordinance, include a termination date and must be <br />reviewed by the City Council for consistency with official controls and <br />the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the request to amend the <br />ordinance is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future and uses <br />of the area. <br />The sites where this use would be allowed must be zoned and guided <br />Industrial. The owner would need to obtain an Interim Use Permit, <br />which must, by ordinance, include a termination date and must be <br />reviewed by the City Council for compatibility with present and future <br />land uses of the surrounding area. Therefore the request to amend the <br />ordinance does not create incompatibility with the present and future <br />land uses of an area. <br />3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained <br />herein. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.