My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/14/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
01/14/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:27:50 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 10:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/14/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y <br />• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />VOTE: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM 7 A <br />Jeff Smyser <br />January 14, 2002 <br />SECOND READING: Ordinance 23 -01 <br />Interim Ordinance Establishing A Moratorium <br />On Residential Development <br />3/5 <br />The comprehensive plan sets the policy direction, while the implementation of the plan occurs <br />through official controls such as the subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance. Staff has set <br />up a process for amending the official controls to implement the plan. A moratorium will protect <br />the City while this is occurring. The proposed ordinance will prohibit most types of residential <br />development activity in the City for one year. <br />• The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 23 -01 on December 17. <br />• <br />ANALYSIS <br />There are three main reasons for the moratorium. First, the comprehensive plan is still <br />undergoing review by the Metropolitan Council as required by state statute. Until the Met <br />Council approves the plan, the City is in an awkward position between the old, sketchy plan and <br />the new one. <br />Second, the comprehensive plan establishes numerous policies such as reducing growth and <br />preserving environmental features through better design, among others. The current official <br />controls don't provide the means to implement these policies. If the City wants to deny new <br />development applications that aren't consistent with its policies, it should have clear and easily <br />defensible reasons that are supported in the ordinances. <br />Three, we anticipate new development applications in the very near future. The moratorium will <br />allow staff and consultants to devote resources to the ordinance project rather than attempting to <br />review new applications using ordinances that may or may not support the comprehensive plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.