My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />Councilmember Dahl noted there had been a request to televise the Comprehensive Plan Task Force <br />meetings since the results of those meetings would effect the entire community. She felt televising <br />the Development Regulations Task Force meetings may or may not be a good idea and she was <br />willing to support the rest of the Council's wishes. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -03, establishing the Development <br />Regulations Task Force and adopting its bylaws. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson noted Article VI of the bylaws indicated the Task Force shall terminate on <br />November 30, 2002, or by simple majority vote of the City Council. She noted the Council would <br />like to see the ordinance work completed before November 30th if possible and suggested Article VI <br />be amended to state the DRTF shall complete all revisions and terminate on or before November 30, <br />2002, or by simple majority vote of the City Council. She felt this would put more emphasis on the <br />desire to complete the Task Force work as soon as possible. <br />Councilmembers Reinert and Dahl concurred with this dent to the Development Regulations <br />Task Force bylaws. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02 -03 can be found in the City Cier <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Consider First Reading of Ordinance 01 -02, Vacating Easement and <br />Accepting New Easement, Lot 1, Block` 10, Lakes Addition No. 3, Jeff Smyser — City Planner <br />Smyser advised two actions approved by;Ethe Cry years ago were never officially recorded. This arose <br />recently during the sale of the property. ``An abstract company has asked the City to resolve the issue. <br />This lot was involved in an extremely complicated series of events going back several decades. The <br />immediate concern is resolving Iwo ca,sernent issues on this lot. <br />City Planner Smyser indicated at the time of a legal settlement between the City and a developer in <br />1989, the intent was to vacate part of the easements on Lot 1, Block 10. This was done to <br />accommodate the placement of a home closer to the front and side lot lines than would have been <br />allowed under the ordinances in effect at that time. In order to make the lot buildable, it was <br />necessary to vacate the easements and grant setback variances. The City Council, in 1989, approved <br />the necessary easement vacations and setback variances. Subsequently, a house was built on the lot <br />according to the reduced setbacks, however, the easement vacation was never recorded. <br />City Planner Smyser indicated, in addition to the partial vacation of the lot line easements, a separate <br />drainage and utility easement covering a large portion of the back of the lot was to be dedicated to the <br />City to cover a wet area. This easement was never recorded either and the City has received a new <br />easement grant document from the current owner. The City should accept this easement so it can be <br />recorded. <br />cp. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.