06/10/2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Raske Building Systems page 5 According to the applicant, there will be no such outdoor storage on -site. If outdoor storage is proposed at some future point, the processing of a conditional use permit would be necessary. It is unlikely that the CUP requirements would be met on this site. Grading, Drainage and Utilities: There were a number of unresolved technical design issues listed in a City Engineer's memo dated 5/2/02 related to grading, drainage and utilities. These issues must be resolved. They have been added to the appropriate resolutions as conditions of approval. The conditions require that the issues are resolved either before the minor subdivision is certified or before site work can begin, depending on the particular item. Easements: The submitted "Sketch and Description" illustrates a drainage easement over a ponding area in the western portion of Parcel G. Additionally, drainage and utility easements are shown along the northern and southern boundaries of Parcel F. The acceptability of such easements should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Park Dedication: The proposed minor subdivision will be subject to park dedication requirements. For industrial development, a park dedication requirement of $2,175 per acre is required. With proposed Parcels F and G comprising 3.8 acres of upland area (exclusive of • ponding), a park dedication of $8,265 will be required prior to the City certifying the proposed minor subdivision. Rice Creek Watershed District Review: This application was brought before the Rice Creek Watershed District on April 24, 2002. The Watershed District approved the tabling with authorization for administrative action (TWAFAA). As a condition of site and building plan approval the Watershed District Permit must be received prior to City building permit issuance. Performance Agreement: Prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant will be required to enter into a performance agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed development on April 24, 2002. The comments and recommendation of the Environmental Board are attached to this report. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD At the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on May 8, concern was raised regarding the ability of the site to contain hazardous material spills. According to the Fire Chief, both the Building Code