Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting <br />Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance <br />August 26, 2002 <br />• wetlands and/or drainage easements only in the far southeast corner of the proposed 18- <br />acre parcel. <br />Septic Issues <br />Soils tests confirm that the proposed 11 -acre parcel is capable of accommodating a septic <br />system. In addition, there is adequate room for both primary and secondary sites. The <br />18- acre parcel already contains a septic system, with adequate room for a secondary site. <br />Access Issues <br />The existing 29 -acre parcel contains an access drive onto Ash Street. A second access <br />drive will be required for the proposed 11 -acre parcel. As Ash Street is a County road, <br />plans have been forwarded to the Anoka County Highway Department for review and <br />approval. <br />Future Implications <br />It should be noted, that while the property is Rural now, development is likely at some <br />point in time once utilities become available — post 2010, since this is a Stage 2 Growth <br />Area. In terms of long range planning, ensuring that lot dimension requirements are <br />maintained now will help ensure the orderly facilitation of that probable future <br />development. <br />For example, the area north of the proposed home site is likely to be subdivided at some <br />future time. At such a time, room for road access then becomes a vital issue. In this <br />case, siting a home in the middle of a lot having only 221 feet of width/road frontage may <br />preclude the possibility of servicing the area north of the proposed home with future road <br />access (a home and attached garage measuring 50 feet, sited in the middle of a 221 -foot <br />lot, does not leave enough room on either side for 66 feet of road width and setbacks...). <br />Future road access across the second proposed lot (Parcel B) may also be problematic, as <br />there appears to be only approximately 50 -60 feet between the existing home and the <br />edge of a pond/wetland area at the southeastern corner of the property. <br />Maintaining the required minimum lot width of 330 feet would preclude such future <br />problems. Section 3, subdiv. 3.A.2.b.5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance addresses <br />such issues when it states: <br />"All subdivisions in areas without public sanitary sewer shall be designed such <br />that the larger non -sewer lots can be resubdivided to provide smaller sewered lots <br />when sewer becomes available in the future. Homes and accessory buildings <br />shall be located on these lots so as to allow for future resubdivisions." <br />Additionally, utility availability is often financially feasible only when shared among a <br />group of property owners. Thus, limiting future development possibilities in ways such <br />