My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/23/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
09/23/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 1:36:35 PM
Creation date
2/7/2014 10:02:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/23/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting <br />Lindahl Minor Subdivision & Variance <br />September 23, 2002 <br />Comment: The property has been, and currently is, being put to reasonable <br />use. The applicant is simply asking for a further intensification of use. <br />2.) That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br />his property, not created by the land owner. <br />Comment: The landowner is asking a further subdivision of his land, <br />which he was advised "would probably not be recommended" when he first <br />purchased his property. <br />3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />Comment: There is no hardship demonstrated or apparent; rather the <br />proposed lots simply do not meet the minimum lot requirements for property <br />in a Rural zone. <br />4.) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, <br />structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />Comment: Granting a Variance without the demonstration of hardship or <br />unique circumstances would confer upon the applicant special privilege. <br />5.) That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />Comment: The proposed action would not be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Ordinance, as Variances are to be granted only in cases where <br />hardship /unique physical circumstances are present. <br />P & Z RECOMMENDATION <br />The above report was presented at the August 14 & September 11, 2002 meeting of the <br />Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted to <br />recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision, with the following conditions: <br />1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665 to be paid prior to the certification and <br />recording of the Minor Subdivision. <br />2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements <br />measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in <br />width along side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. <br />Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.