My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/09/2002 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
01/09/2002 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 10:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 10:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
01/09/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 7 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Pastor Gilbertson noted this information did not specify the actual amount of land needed <br />for right-of-way dedication. Ms. Gretz indicat ed Exhibit three in this evening’s staff <br />report had been included in the agenda packet for the May 27, 1997 City Council <br />meeting. <br />Chair Schaps stated it would be very unusual for a right-of-way dedication to not extend <br />to the end of a parcel since the intent of the right-of-way was to allow the future <br />extension of and connection to a roadway. <br />Pastor Gilbertson questioned why the Church would be responsible for the extension of <br />the roadway. Chair Schaps stated in the event the property owner wished to develop the <br />land, part of that agreement would be the extension of the roadway. <br />Pastor Gilbertson indicated the Church has no future development plans at this point. <br />Chair Schaps indicated this was the reason the City has a transportation plan in order to <br />plan for future development that may or may not be anticipated at this time. <br />Pastor Gilbertson believed the Church would be willing to provide the necessary right-of- <br />way dedication. However, he reiterated that when the Minor Subdivision had originally <br />been approved the right-of-way expectations had been very unclear. <br />Ms. Gretz noted at this time the City was only asking for the dedication of the right-of- <br />way, not the payment of any assessments. <br />Chair Schaps confirmed it was the consensus of the Board that, along with the right-of- <br />way dedication, the intent would be to recommend approval of the construction of the <br />picnic shelter, conditioned on the picnic shelter being reduced slightly in size and the tool <br />shed being attached to the garage, providing the total square-footage of the structures <br />meets the requirements of the ordinance. <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:05 p.m., and was supported <br />by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5-0. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Gethsemane United Methodist <br />Church Conditional Use Permit Amendment for the construction of a picnic shelter, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />1. A building permit must be obtained for construction of the proposed picnic <br />shelter. <br />2. Issuance of the building permit will not be granted until the former approved <br />dedication of the Stage Coach Trail right-of-way is officially recorded. Such <br />dedication is with the understanding that Parcels B and C will be financially <br />responsible for the future construction of the street, as approved by City Council <br />on May 27, 1997.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.