Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 8 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />3. The tool shed and garage structures shall be combined, or the tool shed <br />eliminated, so that the total square-footage of the accessory strucurs on site do not <br />exceed the limiations of the City ordinance and that, once the picnic shelter is <br />constructed, there will only be a total of two accessory structures on site. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5-0. <br />B. PUBLIC HEARING, (Pheasant Hills 12 th Addition, Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment/MUSA Reserve Allocation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Bob Kirmis, <br />NAC) <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing opened at 7:06 p.m. <br />Staff presented the application by Ed Vaughan for an eight lot single family subdivision <br />entitled Pheasant Hills Preserve 12 th Addition. The subject property is located on the <br />north side of Birch Street and west of Timberwolf Trail. <br />Staff advised that to accommodate the propos ed subdivision, the following approvals are <br />required: <br />• A Comprehensive Plan amendment changing the guided use of the subject <br />property from Rural to Low Density Residential and allocating 4.5 acres of <br />MUSA Reserve <br />• Rezoning from R-X, Rural Executive to R-1X, Single Family Executive/PDO, <br />Planned Development Overlay <br />• Preliminary plat <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request by reviewing surrounding land uses and zoning. <br />Staff noted the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the <br />guided use of the subject property from Rural to Low Density Residential. Such change <br />is necessary to accommodate the proposed development density of 1.8 units per acre. <br />The proposed 2001 Comprehensive Plan suggests sewered low density residential use of <br />the subject property which is consistent with the proposed land use. <br />Staff explained that in conjunction with such change, an extension of the MUSA will be <br />necessary to serve the development. Staff presented the evaluation criteria for the <br />allocation of the MUSA reserve that was adopted by the City on September 9, 1996. It <br />was noted that the City presently has 15.7 acres in the MUSA bank. Thus, the requested <br />4.5 acres of MUSA will not exceed the City’s present allocation. <br />Staff noted the applicant has requested the rezoning of the subject property from R-X, <br />Rural Executive to R-1X, Single Family Executive/PDO, Planned Development Overlay. <br />In consideration of rezoning requests, S ection 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Zoning Ordinance <br />states that the Planning and Zoning Board must consider possible adverse effects of the <br />amendment (to the zoning map). Staff presente d the factors that must be addressed when <br />considering a request for rezoning. In addition, the proposed development must also <br />satisfy the City’s infill policy which, among other things, states that the cost of operation