05/08/2002 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 10 APPROVED MINUTES Staff explained according to th e applicant, there would be no outdoor storage on-site. If outdoor storage was proposed at some future point, the processing of an interim use permit would be necessary. Staff stated while the Ordinance did not speci fically define “outdoor storage”, it was the opinion of staff that continuous overnight parking of company vehicles constitutes “outdoor storage” and was not allowe d except via an interim use permit. Staff stated as a condition of site and build ing plan approval, the conditions of the City Engineer’s memo (dated 5/2/02) related to grading, drainage and utilities should be satisfied. Staff noted as submitted “Sketch and Description” illustrates a drainage easement over a ponding area in the western portion of Parcel G. Additionally, drainage and utility easements were shown along the northern and southern boundaries of Parcel F. The acceptability of such easements should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Staff explained as part of the previous pl atting of the property, park dedication was not received. As a result, the proposed mi nor subdivision would be subject to park dedication requirements. For industrial deve lopment, a park dedication requirement of $2,175 per acre was required. With proposed Parcels F and G comprising 3.8 acres of upland area (exclusive of ponding), a park de dication of $8,265 would be required prior to the City certifying the proposed minor subdivision. Staff noted the Environmental Board revi ewed the proposed development on April 24, 2002. Staff stated this application was brought be fore the Rice Creek Watershed District on April 24, 2002. The Watershed District appr oved the tabling with authorization for administrative action (TWAFAA). Staff noted as a condition of site and bu ilding plan approval the Watershed District Permit must be received prior to City building permit issuance. Staff explained prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant would be required to enter into a development agreem ent with the City a nd post all the necessary securities required by it. Staff stated they were recommending the following: A.Approval of the minor subdivision to a llow the subdivision of a 6.6-acre parcel of land (presently described as Parcel E, Apollo Business Park) into 4.5 and 2.1-acre parcels subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicable conditions of the Ci ty Engineer’s memo dated 5/2/02 were satisfactorily met.