Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 8, 2002 <br />Page 14 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Chair Schaps requested the following Recomm endation No. 15: Applicants will add a <br />different building entrance and/or add canopies and accentuate the entrances with <br />landscaping. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve a mi nor subdivision to allow the subdivision of <br />a 6.6 acre parcel of land (presently described as Parcel E, Apollo Business Park) into 4.5 <br />and 2.1 acre parcels subject to the conditions as outlined in staff’s May 8, 2002 report. <br />The motion was supported by Ms. Lane. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Site and Building Plan Review subject to <br />the 15 conditions as outlined in staff’s Ma y 8, 2002 report and as requested by Board <br />members at tonight’s meeting. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. <br />Motion carried 4-0. <br />E.PUBLIC HEARING – Glenn Rehbein, Village Hills, NW corner of Birch St. and <br />Ware Rd., Rezone to PDO and Site Plan Review <br />Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br />Staff explained Glenn Rehbein Companies had submitted an application for Site and <br />Building Plan Review and Rezoning to allow the development of a neighborhood <br />business center at the northwest co rner of Ware Rd. and Birch St. <br />Staff noted the project was scheduled for a public hearing at the May 8, 2002 Planning <br />and Zoning Board Meeting. However, due to recent modifications to the site, the <br />developer had requested the review of th e proposed development be postponed until the <br />June 12, 2002 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. <br />Staff stated no action was necessary at this time. However, public hearing notices were <br />previously distributed. <br />Staff noted that a letter had been received w ith comments and was to be entered into the <br />record. Brian and Katie Politiske, 6509 Hokah Drive, by letter dated May 1, 2002, <br />indicated they were opposed to the rezoning of this property for the reason that they did <br />not believe there was enough room to squeeze a strip mall into a residential area where it <br />would negatively impact their quality of life and property values. They expressed <br />concern about the lights in the parking lot, increased traffic, noi se, and the view from <br />their property. <br />Chair Schaps asked if anyone from the public wished to speak. Nobody responded.