Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 10, 2002 <br />Page 17 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />40 signs would be installed (one sign per two homes) along the wetland edge. The signs <br />would designate the area as a protected wetland zone. The sign would also inform <br />homeowners that moving or cutting beyond the sign was not allowed. The plans also <br />delineate a wetland buffer easement adjacent to wetland to provide additional transition <br />from cultured lawns to native vegetation. Th e developer was proposing the establishment <br />of a Homeowner’s Association to maintain a ll buffer areas and applicable signage. The <br />developer should also make available to all lot purchasers a Best Management <br />Practices/Environmental information brochure identifying purpose of buffer areas, soil <br />and water conditions in infiltration areas, as well as limitations on use of buffer and <br />wetland areas. <br />The application also included a Monitoring Plan that provides for monitoring of the <br />newly created wetlands for a 5- year period. The report would be submitted to Rice <br />Creek Watershed District (RCWD) on a year ly basis. The RCWD was the Regulatory <br />Government Unit (RGU) for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. <br />Security should be required wi thin the development agreement to insure installation of <br />signs as well as the required monitoring. This requirement would need to be coordinated <br />with the RCWD. <br />All exposed soils above the Normal Water Le vel should be seeded with mixes consistent <br />with City of Lino Lakes seed mixtures. The applicant should coordinate seed types with <br />the City’s Environmental Specialist. <br />Tree Preservation. The site contained a number of Oaks in the extreme southeast corner, <br />along the westerly property line a nd one on the north side adjace nt to Birch Street. There <br />was no anticipated tree loss as part of this project. The grading plan identified the <br />installation of fencing along the drip line of the trees. In stallation of tree preservation <br />measures would be required before grading activity on the site. The developer should <br />coordinate all tree preservation activities with the City's Environmental Specialist. <br />CEPTED. Officer Mike Rumps prepared a review on January 21, 2002. He expressed <br />concern with the additional traffic load on Bi rch Street, particularly with morning rush <br />hour traffic. <br />Landscaping. A landscaping plan for screen ing along Birch Street had been submitted as <br />required. The plan consisted of a combina tion of deciduous and coni ferous trees. The <br />City's Environmental Specialist was r ecommending replacement of the proposed <br />Colorado Spruce with the White Spruce. <br />The developer was also proposing to add an additional coniferous tree buffer along the <br />northeasterly and westerly property lines in response to adjacent property owner <br />concerns. <br />Phasing. The applicant was proposing to phase the development over two years. 52 lots <br />were proposed for development in 2002. The remaining 50 lots would be developed in <br />2003.