My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/29/2001 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2001
>
05/29/2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2014 4:14:30 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 12:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/29/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />After the public comment period, the City decides if it has enough information to <br />determine if the project will cause significant environmental effects. If it will not cause <br />such effects, the City makes a "negative declaration" meaning that an EIS is not <br />necessary. If the review process reveals, in the judgement of the City, that the project <br />will cause significant environmental effects, the City makes a "positive declaration" <br />meaning an EIS is necessary. <br />An EIS is a very large, very expensive study. It is not unusual for an EIS cost a million <br />dollars and typically takes several years to complete. <br />A step -by -step summary of the process follows. <br />1. Project proposer submits data. <br />• Normally, the developer completes the EAW form and the City reviews and <br />amends it. <br />• It is the City's document and the City has a responsibility to ensure, to the best of <br />its ability, that it is complete and accurate. <br />2. City approves the EAW for distribution. <br />3. There is a list of agencies to which the EAW must be distributed. <br />4. Availability of the EAW is published in the EQB Monitor. (see attached example) <br />City provides press release to newspaper. <br />5. Thirty -day public comment period begins on day of publication. <br />6. After comment period closes, City determines if it has enough information to make a <br />determination. <br />• If not, it can postpone the decision for 30 more days to gather information. <br />7. If City has sufficient information, it should make a determination within 30 days of <br />the close of the comment period. <br />• A negative declaration means there will be no significant environmental effects <br />from the project and an EIS is not necessary. <br />• A positive declaration means an EIS is necessary. <br />8. The City provides its decision within five days to the distribution list and everyone <br />who submitted a comment. <br />9. The City must respond to all substantive comments and distribute the responses. <br />The attached EAW is the main part of the document —the questions and answers. There <br />are several hundred pages of exhibits that go along with it. They are listed on page 28. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.